Ashley's Recent Forum Activity

  • I was asking if I could put a variable on say every single sprite object type so they could universally be referred to

    Wouldn't a family of all sprites in the project do this then?

  • The previous post refers to "class variables". These do not exist in Construct. This kind of thing is typical with AI-generated posts - they tend to produce content that sounds plausible but is actually wrong and misleading and pollutes the forum with incorrect information. Please see our Forum & Community guidelines which say this, and note further such posts may result in a ban:

    Please don't use AI, such as ChatGPT, to generate content. It often produces text that sounds plausible, but is actually misleading, incorrect, or otherwise unhelpful. This causes confusion and ends up wasting people's time and making it harder for people to get help. It can also put pressure on more experienced users to have to step in and provide a correction, as it's important to ensure the forum is a useful source of information. So please only write posts that you personally know to be true and don't rely on AI to generate responses for you.

  • If a Sprite belongs to FamilyA and FamilyB, then only actions on Sprite can access instance variables inherited from FamilyA and FamilyB. There is no way for an action on FamilyA to access instance variables from FamilyB - nor is it clear how such a feature would work - what if a member of FamilyA does not belong to FamilyB but you run an action on it accessing a FamilyB instance variable? I think for this type of thing you just have to work within the system.

  • We've seen this issue reported a number of times but we've never been able to identify why it happens - it works fine for us and most other people it seems. My best guess is you have a browser extension installed which is interfering with Construct and breaking it, so try disabling any browser extensions you have. If you find which one is causing the problem, it would be useful to know, in case it's possible for us to work around it, or so the problem could be reported to the browser extension developer.

  • I am also not a lawyer, but I believe part of the problem is that AI is still new enough that copyright law hasn't caught up yet, so there are lots of unknowns. Perhaps it's fine, or perhaps you'll be infringing copyright. You might need to wait until the situation becomes clearer.

    I've also seen cases where AI image generators are able to create obviously copyrighted or trademarked images. It's obvious enough to see if it generated Mario, which is a Nintendo copyright, but how do you know if it generated something else obviously copyrighted that you're not already familiar with? It's a difficult question and it's not clear to me how AI image generators can completely solve that problem.

    But yeah, I don't think anyone you'll talk to on this forum is able to offer proper legal advice, so this is probably all just speculation.

  • It's probably a question better asked to itch.io themselves - but as far as I know, Android devices deliberately make it difficult to install apps from anywhere other than its own app store for security reasons, so it'll probably be difficult whatever you do. It might be a lot easier just to do a web export.

  • Generally browsers are designed so it's impossible for merely visiting a website to harm your computer in any way. This is definitely not true of running a desktop app, so in this sense browsing the web is fundamentally more secure than running apps locally.

    For an iframe in a game to show a malicious website, the game would probably have to have chosen to do that, which means the game itself is a malicious website. However merely loading or showing it cannot generally harm your computer in any way. If you start interacting with the page it may then try to harm your computer - probably by getting you to download a desktop app, because those are more useful for malicious purposes and it's difficult to do any lasting harm from a website, as browser security is generally very tough and hard to bypass.

    A malicious website might try to do something like trick you in to entering your personal details, or pretend to be your bank and try to steal your login details. This isn't anything to do with Construct or HTML5 games though - these are just general risks of browsing the web, and these risks can be mitigated by some general rules of thumb, like don't download desktop apps unless you know for certain they are trustworthy, check the address bar is the website you're expecting, etc. But the bottom line is: websites are pretty much the safest way to run software - they're generally safer than mobile apps, and certainly safer than desktop apps. No other platform has such strict protections for privacy and security.

  • editor.construct.net/r407-2/components/bars/propertiesBar/https://editor.construct.net/yGo-WcBiKFxRwjDdQbSKot_YC5B1XbMpl55bpxqk7N2ZPmR2A-LUNmK6GYGvmAn9xUis7zbseYotB6BtbpMaYA==

    Unfortunately it's completely mangled that URL - it seems to have duplicated the full URL after part of the path. I don't think there's any way around this on our side. It looks a lot like a bug in NordVPN incorrectly processing URLs, so it would be great if you could report it to them.

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
  • Ah, there you go. Can you post one of the full modified URLs anyway? Just in case it's easy for us to work around on the server side.

    It would also be good if you could report this to NordVPN so they can make sure nobody else has the problem.

    You can find a full list of domains that Construct uses here if you can set up per-domain exceptions.

  • Probably the best way to figure out what's going on is look in dev tools at the failing network requests. Find the first one that fails with status 400 and see what the full URL is and share it here. It looks like something is adding a lot of nonsense to the URLs Construct requests, which makes them invalid and so the server returns 400 Bad Request. Then the question is: what is changing the URLs to do that? It might be obvious from the full URL if there's something like "contosoantivirus-xyzabc123..." in there, but it might not be obvious either.

    Whenever I've seen this before it's been a browser extension messing up URLs, and turning off the browser extension fixed it.

  • Thanks for the feedback! We think JavaScript (and TypeScript too) are great features and hugely powerful, so it's nice to see people happy with using them!

  • You do not have permission to view this post

Ashley's avatar

Ashley

Early Adopter

Member since 21 May, 2007

Twitter
Ashley has 1,378,068 followers

Connect with Ashley

Trophy Case

  • Jupiter Mission Supports Gordon's mission to Jupiter
  • Forum Contributor Made 100 posts in the forums
  • Forum Patron Made 500 posts in the forums
  • Forum Hero Made 1,000 posts in the forums
  • Forum Wizard Made 5,000 posts in the forums
  • Forum Unicorn Made 10,000 posts in the forums
  • Forum Mega Brain Made 20,000 posts in the forums
  • x107
    Coach One of your tutorials has over 1,000 readers
  • x61
    Educator One of your tutorials has over 10,000 readers
  • x2
    Teacher One of your tutorials has over 100,000 readers
  • Sensei One of your tutorials has over 1,000,000 readers
  • Regular Visitor Visited Construct.net 7 days in a row
  • Steady Visitor Visited Construct.net 30 days in a row
  • RTFM Read the fabulous manual
  • x35
    Great Comment One of your comments gets 3 upvotes
  • Email Verified

Progress

32/44
How to earn trophies

Blogs