Ashley's Recent Forum Activity

  • That looks a lot like this issue that I filed back in March (and is noted under "known issues" in the original post here). I'll add a comment noting the device you mentioned.

  • The Linux export option is new and currently only available in beta releases. It will make its way to the next stable release on the usual schedule (hopefully within a few weeks from now).

  • The Windows WebView2 and Linux CEF export options both support Steam, and we're working on adding it for macOS WKWebView too.

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
  • I'd recommend using the Windows WebView2, macOS WKWebView, or the new Linux CEF (currently latest beta only) export options if you can - long term we will likely be phasing out NW.js.

  • I'm afraid generally it's impossible to help without more information, which is why we came up with our bug report guidelines. It's best to file an issue following all the guidelines as we need all that information to be able to help.

  • Did you try running from the terminal to see if any errors were logged there?

  • I tried that project on an iPad running iOS 16.7 and it seemed to work fine for me.

    This happens a lot, which is why we ask that any problems are reported to the issue tracker following all the guidelines - normally we need all the requested information to be able to help.

  • It's difficult to help without more information. Are all your audio files in WebM Opus format? Can you share a minimal project demonstrating the problem?

  • Press F12 and look in the browser console - are there any error messages?

    Try disabling any browser extensions you have installed, or try using a different browser. A common cause of people having weird issues loading Construct is buggy browser extensions that interfere with Construct and break it.

  • I set up dual boot to Ubuntu 22 LTS. WSL is good for command-line stuff but its support for GUI apps is clunky and a bit weird - I don't think it's worth using. A VM should probably work as well, but I just boot in to a real system to remove any complications from VMs (particularly around GPU drivers, which seem to not always work so well in a VM, and Linux has enough trouble with GPU drivers as it is).

    I'd note the OS version you build on has significant compatibility implications: due to the way glibc seems to work on Linux, it requires the glibc version of the system you build on - so in short it won't run on any older OSs than the one you build on. This seems to be a particularly horrible aspect of Linux development: use too old a system and all the compilers are out-of-date and you might not be able to build anything at all, but if you choose too new a system it won't support some older OSs still in use. You can work around this with various options for virtualization, building your own toolchains, or integrating runtime environments (Steam has one) - I researched those and they all look like a total nightmare. So I just use Ubuntu 22 LTS and build on that and it seems good enough and the right balance between old and new.

    Also you have to install Steam directly from steampowered.com (I noted this in the Steamworks documentation). Ubuntu's app store has Steam, but if you install it from there, integration doesn't work. I haven't looked in to this too much but I'd guess that Ubuntu's app store uses some kind of emulation to install the Windows version of Steam and be able to run Windows games, whereas the official version is a genuine Linux version; as Construct's Linux export is a genuine Linux export, I guess it can't talk to a Windows emulated version. Just a theory though. To help debug it you can run the exported Linux app from a terminal and you should see some messages logged to the terminal about whether the Steamworks plugin was able to initialize. If it doesn't load it at all, probably something else is wrong, like the .so was built incorrectly (e.g. perhaps built on a system using newer glibc or something like that).

    Fortunately it looks like Valve have done a good job of making the Steam Deck easier to work with - obviously you can't do things like install the wrong Steam, its glibc is pretty up-to-date so that doesn't cause a problem, and generally if it runs on Ubuntu it just works on the Steam Deck too. I don't think I had to actually change anything at all specifically for the Steam Deck.

    For IDEs, I just use VS Code - I'm already familiar with it, and if you install the C++ and CMake extensions you can build, run and debug in VS Code, and it's good enough. Of course you can use different tools, build setups or whatever, but in my limited experience you quickly end up going down a rabbit hole doing things like spending hours configuring a build system to build a custom tool to build something else, and I'd rather do something straightforward so I can actually get real work done.

    In short I learned a lot about Linux development, and it's overall a huge pain, and no surprise lots of people don't bother (sorry Linux fans - at least sort out the glibc situation and the whole thing will be a lot better). However I focused on getting as simple and straightforward a setup as possible, and that makes it tolerable. Perhaps I should write this up in a blog or something.

  • I wonder if it's possible to switch from NWJS to WebView2 in an already published Steam game?

    I think the only serious problem is how to handle Local Storage specifically. Local Storage data goes in to a database somewhere in the app data folder. I don't think there's any good documentation on how it works - despite the fact both use the Chromium browser engine, I wouldn't be surprised if there were weird issues that come up with pointing WebView2 at an NW.js app data folder.

    On the other hand, using files for storage will work with either kind of exporter. So if your project writes storage as files to some known folder that both NW.js and the File System plugin can access, then both can read/write safely to the same files.

    If you have an existing project deployed using Local Storage though, this is a tricky migration to pull off. You'd probably have to go through three versions:

    • Version A: existing NW.js export using Local Storage
    • Version B: an updated NW.js export that uses files instead, and automatically copies any existing Local Storage to files for backwards compatibility
    • Version C: a WebView2 export that only uses files and does not attempt to use Local Storage

    This is tricky to set up so definitely test anything like this carefully and thoroughly. However with this approach so long as everyone updates A -> B -> C, it should continue working without anyone noticing anything. One particularly difficult problem though is that even long after version C is out, anyone updating directly from A -> C will lose their save data. With software updates it is very difficult to guarantee exactly 100% of people have updated - usually it approaches but does not meet 100%, going 99%, 99.9%, 99.99% etc. and a few people end up left out for whatever reason. One way to mitigate this is to move to version B as soon as possible, but I doubt that will completely solve the problem - you'll still have a few people who lose their data. Another way to mitigate that is to have explicit "export your data" and "import your data" options in the user interface, so you can document this and provide manual instructions for anyone left behind, ideally with instructions on how to roll back to version A if they need to.

    We've gone through such migrations with Construct a few times over the years and they can be a challenge. My advice: approach with a great deal of caution and do it slowly over time.

    The other option is: just stick to NW.js. It's a lot easier as it means not having to do anything different! I think we will continue to support it until the next LTS release, which should mean at least LTS support until the end of 2026. Even after that, if anyone had major published projects that desperately needed some change, we'd still do it if at all possible - I appreciate there's lots of long-term projects out there still using NW.js and we don't want anyone to be left stuck with problems out of support.

  • It looks like this was previously discussed here.

    If the command-line switch works, you can use it - but it's a workaround, and usually we try to avoid making workarounds built-in, as it ends up getting messy in the long run. Construct already asks for the high-performance GPU (respecting the GPU preference in Project Properties, which defaults to high performance), but at the moment the Chromium browser engine ignores that. In an ideal world Chromium would support that and everything would run on the high-performance GPU by default without having to do anything. This issue looks like the most recent time it's been filed with Google, so I added a comment there - more votes on that issue might help.

Ashley's avatar

Ashley

Early Adopter

Member since 21 May, 2007

Twitter
Ashley has 1,378,055 followers

Connect with Ashley

Trophy Case

  • Jupiter Mission Supports Gordon's mission to Jupiter
  • Forum Contributor Made 100 posts in the forums
  • Forum Patron Made 500 posts in the forums
  • Forum Hero Made 1,000 posts in the forums
  • Forum Wizard Made 5,000 posts in the forums
  • Forum Unicorn Made 10,000 posts in the forums
  • Forum Mega Brain Made 20,000 posts in the forums
  • x107
    Coach One of your tutorials has over 1,000 readers
  • x61
    Educator One of your tutorials has over 10,000 readers
  • x2
    Teacher One of your tutorials has over 100,000 readers
  • Sensei One of your tutorials has over 1,000,000 readers
  • Regular Visitor Visited Construct.net 7 days in a row
  • Steady Visitor Visited Construct.net 30 days in a row
  • RTFM Read the fabulous manual
  • x35
    Great Comment One of your comments gets 3 upvotes
  • Email Verified

Progress

32/44
How to earn trophies

Blogs