NedSanders's Recent Forum Activity

  • Ashley Is it possible that this is a bug? I've continued to look online and my understanding is that this should be working and appears to have worked for others?

    My event sheet currently looks like this:

  • I'm attempting to create a project which uses a simple color picker. I've opted to use the HTML Element with the content '<input type="color">' which gives me a lovely default color picker. However, I now need to read the color value of the picker so that I can use it.

    After looking online, I've seen several suggestions but none have worked. The most promising one involved creating a global string called MyColor and using this method:

    Set HTML Element content to: <input type="color" id="colorPicker">

    On Space: runtime.globalVars.MyColor= document.getElementById("colorPicker").value;

    However, this doesn't appear to influence the variable at all.

    I'm aware there are workarounds such as creating my own color picker, but I really want to learn how to use HTML and javascript in Construct 3 so I'm determined to get to the bottom of this and hopefully gain a better understanding of these features.

  • I have a function that uses the set return value action. Strangely, everything in the code seems to work as intended, except for the return value function. The debug text object always displays "???" and when I remove that line, it displays "" (i.e. an empty string) regardless of the outcome.

    The image below contains comments, which should make it clearer.

    I may be missing something, but if the set opacity events are triggering, surely the set return value ones should be as well?

    Tagged:

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads

  • I’ve been developing a mobile app which uses text input HTML object. I’ve noticed that selecting the text input causes the browser to zoom in automatically and then stay zoomed in permanently when using on mobile. Is it possible to disable this?

    This is being hosted on itch.io for testing, I’ve included a link below as well as a video of the issue.

    Itch: nedsanders.itch.io/vtm-app

    Video: drive.google.com/file/d/146KFDTKoPQ8VRXcoJw_C0jqEF17yIh-v/view

  • I'm trying to use the Evaluate Expression condition to parse expressions stored in a variable, but the more I try, it's overwhelmingly seeming like this isn't possible. I've created the following simple block of code to demonstrate, but no matter whether the Expression variable is true or not, it always shows as true. Have I misunderstood the condition?

    Part of the reason I want to achieve this is to facilitate a rudimentary conditions function in the Flowchart tool. The idea is that certain nodes can have tags that will just be expressions ("Coins => 25", etc.) that can be read by the Evaluate Expression to determine the outcome. I'm aware that javascript has an eval() function that as far as I'm aware, allows for this exact thing, but Construct doesn't seem to recognise it.

  • There are tutorials on using JSON to handle branching dialog:

    https://www.construct.net/en/tutorials/json-branch-dialogue-example-3013

    https://www.construct.net/en/tutorials/branching-dialogue-using-json-2395

    These are relatively outdated, given that the Flowchart system is probably the most viable route for this now. I've built a prototype dialogue system using it and it's powerful, just limited by how young its feature set is as of now.

    It's very easy to create a simple dialogue system in C3, but as you add more complexity (conditions, tags, variables, etc.) it tends to fall apart. I got as far as the ability to change and read variables from a dictionary and enable basic conditions, but the whole thing felt extremely unstable and I wouldn't feel safe committing to an entire game built on it.

    I agree with OP that a plug-in to handle those more complex features would be ideal - but it's also hard to know whether it would be a waste of time or not, since Ashley and the team have been very hush hush about the roadmap for Flowcharts and how much more they intend to develop it. I - like a lot of us atm - am just waiting on more info before I continue any branching dialogue heavy projects.

  • I also haven't found a use for it yet, and would be curious if there's anyone who has.

    I've been using it to build a pretty simple branching dialogue system (clip below). It's a little awkward and I'm finding that you have to establish your own limited functions and mechanics in order to work with it but I'm hoping we get a bit more flexibility going forward. In particular, I've found that you can push the tag function with tokenat and essentially create multiple tags per node, which makes things like skillchecks and animation a bit easier but yeah, most of it feels like hacky workarounds.

    Subscribe to Construct videos now

  • Rather than saying "the Flowchart feature is missing some fundamental features" where's your useful feedback?

    I have provided feedback. Specifically, around the inability to loop back to previous nodes. Like you and a ton of other people, I didn't get a response. The team cannot possibly be expected to fulfil everyone's expectations or implement everyone's requests.

    But my reply was unnecessarily aggressive and I apologise. I think it's fair to express disappointment in a product you paid for, it was just the way you expressed it that rubbed me up the wrong way. For context, when the feature was first announced, I saw a huge number of people with very high expectations making a lot of feature requests and it was clear that it was never going to be absolutely everything that everyone wanted. I thought there was likely to be disappointment, but I felt that your disappointment was worded in an unnecessarily aggressive way - specifically, putting myself in the shoes of the C3 team, I got a bit hung up on how demoralising I would find it. I shouldn't have matched that aggression and I concede that the points you raised, outside of my kneejerk reaction to how they were worded, are very valid.

    I think brushfe summarised the issue with people's expectations and ambiguity around how the new feature is being framed very well. A roadmap or anything to indicate where the feature is likely to go and what it might look like later down the line would be very useful.

  • As long as the json you load is the same format as the json you saved from the dictionary it should work. You can’t just load a general json into a dictionary.

    Presumably, if I'm downloading Dictionary.AsJSON, it would already be in the same format? How can I ensure that the format is consistent across downloads and uploads?

  • Ashley Any advice?

  • Hello! I feel like I'm going a bit mad. I've followed several forum posts and tutorials but can't see what I'm doing wrong.

    I want my user to be able to download and upload relevant information as a json file. I've managed to implement downloading and when it comes to uploading, I can get as far as loading the json (it appears with all the correct info in the JSON debug field) HOWEVER, the upload to dictionary part is just not working. Am I missing something obvious? Any help would be appreciated.

  • But supporting this function will also face a problem, the lines will become confusing.

    I work with in-house tool to build branching dialogue and we minimise this issue with a 'link to' node - a simple node that, upon entered, immediately redirects to another, somewhere else in the flow.

NedSanders's avatar

NedSanders

Member since 31 May, 2022

None one is following NedSanders yet!

Trophy Case

  • 2-Year Club
  • Jupiter Mission Supports Gordon's mission to Jupiter
  • Regular Visitor Visited Construct.net 7 days in a row
  • RTFM Read the fabulous manual
  • Great Comment One of your comments gets 3 upvotes
  • Email Verified

Progress

7/44
How to earn trophies