tiled background with image offset actions would work way better than the above example.

(it needs to be power of 2 sized though)

its good practice to give us pictures, people dont like downloading exes from out of nowhere, and definitely package them as a .zip rather than an installer, so people can look at the contents safely.

perhaps trying running construct as an admin/ in admin mode, sometimes windows wont let programs create files, let alone an exe, unless they're given admin power

iconoclasts & towerclimb

it'd be nice to have a feature for retro scaling, that just scales the final rendered texture, not the window, not the layers, just the final render, so things look the same on all displays.

the fact that c1 isnt "1.0" doesnt mean it isn't a full featured program, the devs just didn't feel they should slap a lazy 1.0 onto a program. you can easily make a complete game. lucid couldn't be more right with his post

i personally use C1.

those aren't actually 3d boxes, they're made of distort maps, as are the shadows, i think you should get the same "static effect" with 3d boxes as long as you placed them on the z axis cleverly enough and rotated them.

what exactly do you mean by depth effect?

i've had poutine at quite a few places, it's just not THAT good, i prefer GOOD fries alone.

thats what moving the right analog stick in an fps 50 years from now will feel like

poutine is gravy and cheese on fries, its incredibly overrated.

tastes like overly salty soggy fries with gummy stuff in it.

but youll get the same problems and run into a 100 more making your own animation system.

its possible but highly complex, bone animation will probably be your best bet as a novice user, it gets extremely complicated if you try building your own animation engine like lucid is doing and has been for quite a while, or like i have tried in the past.