Objects that i dont want to be part of my layout

This forum is currently in read-only mode.

Replies Disabled

❤Follow Topic(8)

0 favourites

11 posts

From the Asset Store

I-Spy (Hidden objects)

$49 USD

Welcome! I-Spy (Hidden objects) is an educational puzzle that is more than just seek-and-find activities.

sanjibnanda

- Xombul
- - Joined 2 Feb, 2009
  - 11 topics • 46 posts
- 1
- 11 Mar, 2009
- Quote
I have an Object like bullets that are only to be created dynamicly when shot by a cannon.

At the moment I need to have at least one instance of those in the layout. I just thinks it looks messy even if its off screen. So can I have it appear only in the Object panel?
- Arima
- - Joined 11 Jun, 2007
  - 181 topics • 2,845 posts
- 1
- 11 Mar, 2009
- Quote
You can set the object's opacity to 0 and then right click it and lock it. I think you can also hide it via the same menu instead.
- madster
- - Joined 17 Feb, 2009
  - 77 topics • 1,412 posts
- 1
- 12 Mar, 2009
- Quote
also, if it's a sprite you can set "destroy on startup"
- Rich
- - Joined 20 Feb, 2008
  - 73 topics • 1,776 posts
- 1
- 12 Mar, 2009
- Quote
Right click -> hide is meant for exactly this.
- Xombul
- - Joined 2 Feb, 2009
  - 11 topics • 46 posts
- 1
- 12 Mar, 2009
- Quote
I am not able to select hide in the context menu. And even if its hidden. I still feel that i would be a bit messy. I guess I would prefer to have zero instances in some way instead of hiding one instance
- Mipey
- - Joined 16 Jan, 2009
  - 97 topics • 1,858 posts
- 1
- 12 Mar, 2009
- Quote
Indeed, the "Hide" is grayed out.
- SoldjahBoy
- - Joined 2 Apr, 2008
  - 155 topics • 3,003 posts
- 1
- 12 Mar, 2009
- Quote
Messy? Try programming it from scratch and see how messy it is. Hide is there for a reason. If you still think it's messy, drag it waaaaaay off the side so you will never see it again.

~Sol
- Xombul
- - Joined 2 Feb, 2009
  - 11 topics • 46 posts
- 1
- 12 Mar, 2009
- Quote
Even if I don't see it it i guess it will still be there. That means it will be tested for collisions? And it will influence the instance count. I would so much prefer that Objects in genereal could exist without instances.

And just moving instances out of site is ugly... when I write program from scratch I never have unused instances.

But... anyway, ... if its not possible to have objects without instances it would help to be able to hide them
- Rich
- - Joined 20 Feb, 2008
  - 73 topics • 1,776 posts
- 1
- 12 Mar, 2009
- Quote
No, they won't be tested for collisions. If an object is set to opacity 0 and locked, it's as if it isn't there.. I really don't see the problem .
Try Construct 3

Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.
Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
- Ashley Construct Team Founder
- Moderator
- - Joined 21 May, 2007
  - 669 topics • 30,334 posts
- 1
- 12 Mar, 2009
- Quote
Tick the 'destroy on startup' attribute and it won't be created on startup, and therefore won't contribute to the object count, test collisions, or do anything else. It's necessary to have at least one instance of an object, so Construct knows what properties to assign an object when you create one at runtime.
- SpongeBrain
- - Joined 7 Feb, 2009
  - 18 topics • 105 posts
- 1
- 16 Mar, 2009
- Quote
As a couple of people have already pointed out in this thread, the "Hide" is greyed out in the right-click menu.

Is this going to be brought back in the next build?