cjbruce Can you please share an example of your method, just a simple capx demo alongside the instructions so I can update the thread with your post. Thanks in advance.

I've never seen a web application which does not use the subscription model, so I don't know if a pay once model will work since the costs of running C3 on a server and maintaining it must be quite high.

Although I think that the best way to do so is by making the payment model pay-once and charging extra per each exporter or feature. In short, the only other option besides the subscription model is the pay-once/pay-extra-per-package model:

• Construct 3 lifetime registration = xxx $
• Android exporter package = xxx $
• iOS exporter package = xxx $
• NWJS/Electron exporter package = xxx $
• Marketing boost package = xxx $

etc ...

Even so, I don't think that it will cover their monthly bills.

So it's not the Nvidia driver's fault, you could try these options:

• Running C2 in Windows 7 compatibility mode
• Booting in Safe mode and testing C2
• Running Windows Update and checking if there is a major update that has not been installed yet
• Making sure that .Net Framework 4.5 is installed ( IDK if C2 even uses this )

I can't think of any other options

The only thing that you can do to determine if it's really the nvidia driver which causes the issue is this :

1- Uninstall the nvidia driver.

2- Reboot and let Windows install the standard VGA driver

3- Run C2

Ok so did you try with r240 ?

So when did this problem start ? Just after you updated the nvidia driver or what ?

Fallback to the old Nvidia driver.

Or in case you are using a laptop and in case it is equipped with an extra Intel HD graphics card:

Then switch to it when working with C2.

You're sending the Ajax data at each tick while the player location and the P1Location are superior to 100, try adding a third condition : System-> Trigger once while true.

Put it under Player:Location>100

BeastCoasting I'm sorry about the inconvenience, if I had known before that there was no option to remove a score from leader-boards I wouldn't have done this.

tunepunk +1

Ashley The attacker can also NOP the function which compares the two values, you can easily backtrack the function that accesses the Score memory address and the one which writes to it:

I think at the end, a good server-side validation system is the only way to prevent such hacks.

tunepunk Remember that anything that is client-side can be modified, so even if you do that ( comparing amount of arrows to a max value ) , the max value can still be hacked. So there is no point in that if the hackers will set their own max allowed arrows value.