I've seen this pop up quite a few times and read up on quite a few examples.

The problem is I can't see what I'm doing wrong with this. The Player sprite is part of the Players family... but it's not working the way I imagine. I'm only using 1 sprite for all the players.

Instead of setting the "ClosestEnemy" variable to the number assigned to the closest enemy, it appears to be setting it to the enemy with the lowest number.

I've seen people do similar with more events, and I myself have done so, but I'd rather not go through the hassle of complicated code when I know it can be done with only a few lines.

I imagine I'm close, but I can't quite get it right.

Can anyone help?

I mean on special offer. For now I can do the same things with a browser and an excel spreadsheet. I'd rather use this, but not for £20.

Just Super.

Could you give any insight into the process for release on Wii U?

and thoughts on why others like Aurel's The Next Penelope could not be made to work on WiiU >>>

https://www.scirra.com/forum/the-next-penelope-2d-f-zero-ulysses-31_t95911?&p=1100460#p1100460

cheers.....

I can't get too much into the actual process, but I can say that it's the worst part for me. If you intend on making a cheap tacky game, then it's probably pretty easy, but if you intend on making something with substance, it can be hard to make something that the big N will approve the first time around.

The Next Penelope didn't work on the Wii U because it was too good a game, basically. The framework used by N wasn't all that powerful, which made making ambitious games extremely challenging, and sadly, in some cases, impossible. Keeping a steady/stable frame rate is really challenging, even in games like Scribble.

You really have to know the ins and outs of Construct 2 in order to make it worthwhile. Either that, or settle for making shovelware that people will simply review poorly.

Hopefully things will be better for the Switch.

Just realised that I've released a few Construct 2 games now, yet haven't really mentioned them on here.

I bought Construct 2 very very early on in its development, and over the years have slowly learned pretty much every in and out there is. In fact, I now rarely see a 2D game which doesn't cause me to say "I could make that".

This is Scribble, a game that was release on December 15th of last year. It's an asymmetrical game for the Wii U. That pretty much means it's a multiplayer game that gives different players different experiences.

It's an 8 player game, based on the classic board game, Pictionary.

The player with the Wii U GamePad has to draw a certain image in a certain amount of time. It also comes with multiple modes and what I've called "Mutators" that change the way the game is player. For example, sometimes the GamePad screen is covered in ink, making drawing harder, or your drawing is horizontally mirrored, meaning you have to think in a different way.

The game is scoring really well. In fact, the lowest review score it's received so far is from a Spanish site that misunderstood the instructions, but even then they scored it a 6.8/10.

Nintendo Life - http://www.nintendolife.com/reviews/wiiu-eshop/scribble

GamesReviews.com - http://www.gamesreviews.com/wiiu/wiiu-reviews/12/scribble-wiiu-review/

Pure Nintendo - http://purenintendo.com/review-scribble-wii-u-eshop/

Digital Chumps - http://digitalchumps.com/scribble/

It just goes to show that you really can make professional games using Construct 2!

zenox98 I updated my post... which is now full of irony

AnD4D You do not understand what i mean

por cierto te lo dire en español

No hay más necio que el que no quiere entender ni aprender.

They said: By the way, I'll tell you in Spanish

There is no more fool than he who does not want to understand or learn

So I replied:

Tal vez la barrera del idioma es un problema.

Which means: Maybe the language barrier is a problem.

>

> >

> > I hope that the subscription model fails miserably and so learn to listen to the community

> >

>

> Ah, that's poor form. You shouldn't ever wish failure on anyone. It's easy to be bummed, but take a breather on that thinking.

>

You're wrong, it's not personal, I do not wish bad things to anyone, I was going to buy C3, but I do not want a subscriptions system, that's why I want it to fail, but I do not want C3 to fail, only the subscriptions system

can you understand it?

No, you're wrong! It's very personal.

You said "I hope that the subscription model fails miserably and so learn to listen to the community". First of all you're saying that you personally want it to fail...

Second, you want it to fail so that you don't have to buy a subscription system. That sounds pretty personal too.

If the subscription system is a massive success, then that's only a bad thing for you, because you don't want to pay it.

So now you're coming across as inconsiderate, selfish and lacking in moral character. Finally, the fact you came back to argue against these blatant points also makes you foolish.

As I keep saying, I don't care about the subscriptions. People want to learn Game Dev? Learn using Construct 2, or any number of other dev tools. I'll try C3 for the first year, then weigh up my options.

Just please, Scirra, release some actual features that game developers might find useful or interesting, not features that are only really interesting to you guys.

So far we've just seen what looks like Construct 2 working in a Chrome tab. I haven't seen anything worth an upgrade price.

Speaking of which, Chrome crashed on me yesterday out of the blue. Gave me cause for concern...

Bit concerning that there's a post about this on ClickTeam's forum, telling them to expect an influx of Construct users.

I'm weighing up my options, but certainly not set on transitioning until I hear the features.

Nope

> [quote:3lk6jntw]But just one question, while the decision is already made, lets say this model of subscription don't work as intended, would you guys be whilling to reconsider it and go back to pay-once model? Or at least that kind of discussion between you could happen?

>

Well yes, if the model fails we'd of course have to re-evaluate otherwise we'd be fools!

I hope that the subscription model fails miserably and so learn to listen to the community

Well that's unpleasant.

Although I don't like it, they've moved to a subscription system BECAUSE of the in browser software, and they moved to the browser software to enable the program to work on pretty much any system that can run Chrome.

This means they'll be able to widen their user base to other operating systems (theoretically, it may be possible to open it up on phones and tablets), and the subscription system also acts as a security measure.

With the software online, without a subscription, a user could just buy once and share their license with others, potentially resulting in less sales. This way, they get paid every year, which will help enable them to maintain both C2 for a short period and C3 long term.

So I understand it, yes...

I still can't get my head around this method of drip feeding us features on how the actual software is better. So far, all I've heard is that you can do math inside the layout screen.

I look at Construct 2 and consider it capable of doing almost any 2D game I can imagine. I want to know what elevates Construct 3 above it, and as a Windows user, using it in a browser isn't remotely interesting to me.

What if they move to a $99 per month (build box)/$49 per month (Adobe)/€160 per year (bitwig) model?

Heh! Then I'm out. I hate the world slowing moving into a subscription based thing, where nobody owns anything yet continue to pay for everything.

I can't see that happening, otherwise Scirra would have charged for exporters and the like.

People have to remember, a huge number of Construct users are from the Americas, so we'll probably hear something around 2pm when some of them have woken up to make a bigger splash online.

Just sensible marketing.

Saying that! Gimme gimme gimme!