Sqiddster's Profile

- sqiddster
- - Joined 5 Sep, 2011
  - 173 topics • 3,166 posts
- 1
- 12 Feb, 2016
- Quote
I can confirm that the only luck I've had is with 10.5.
- sqiddster
- - Joined 5 Sep, 2011
  - 173 topics • 3,166 posts
- 1
- 22 Nov, 2015
- Quote
If you are willing to give programming a try, I'd highly suggest moving to Unity.

IMO HTML5 isn't ready for large scale commercial projects yet. It most likely will be in the future, but how far away is that? I certainly don't know, and as it stands working with HTML5 is a big gamble.
- sqiddster
- - Joined 5 Sep, 2011
  - 173 topics • 3,166 posts
- 1
- 17 Nov, 2015
- Quote
In terms of save game state, are we totally screwed, or is there a *potential* workaround sometime in the future?
- sqiddster
- - Joined 5 Sep, 2011
  - 173 topics • 3,166 posts
- 1
- 12 Nov, 2015
- Quote
— depends on the machine, when a decent GPU is in play I don't notice many micro-stutters.
Try Construct 3

Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.
Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
- sqiddster
- - Joined 5 Sep, 2011
  - 173 topics • 3,166 posts
- 1
- 11 Nov, 2015
- Quote
— NW 10.5
- sqiddster
- - Joined 5 Sep, 2011
  - 173 topics • 3,166 posts
- 1
- 2 Nov, 2015
- Quote
laypax zenox98 Yep, sorry, just updated the link.
- sqiddster
- - Joined 5 Sep, 2011
  - 173 topics • 3,166 posts
- 1
- 19 Aug, 2015
- Quote
It may very well be that your game is out of the scope of Construct 2. 7000 images is a LOT for this engine. I've been struggling with preview times recently and I have maybe ~750 images.

If most of your images are small, and all part of long animations, you may fare better on export as they will be packed into spritesheets. This doesn't help with the preview issue, however.

I believe Aurel did something like you mentioned, having multiple project files which you combine from time to time.

Ultimately HTML5 with its automated loading/unloading may not be the best choice for a project like this - some fine grained control over what's loaded/unloaded could go very far.
- sqiddster
- - Joined 5 Sep, 2011
  - 173 topics • 3,166 posts
- 1
- 17 Aug, 2015
- Quote
— 6000
Elliott yeah, I'm glad performance was good at least. That's probably one of our more negative reviews, most people were a little bit nicer
- sqiddster
- - Joined 5 Sep, 2011
  - 173 topics • 3,166 posts
- 1
- 16 Aug, 2015
- Quote
HuaHero I worked for about 3.5 years from the first prototype (Not full time, I had school for most of it).
Sorry, there's no development blog.
- sqiddster
- - Joined 5 Sep, 2011
  - 173 topics • 3,166 posts
- 1
- 11 Aug, 2015
- Quote
We're incredibly happy to announce that Airscape: The Fall of Gravity is OUT NOW!

Watch the new launch trailer!

Get Airscape on Steam!

Get Airscape on the Humble Store!
- sqiddster
- - Joined 5 Sep, 2011
  - 173 topics • 3,166 posts
- 1
- 8 Aug, 2015
- Quote
All right, I got it to work with two booleans (one set at edit-time) but it's still dodgy and has a few problems.

The main problem is that I can't set the boolean dynamically, because presumably 'recreate initial objects' collects the object state before any events have even been run. It's important that they are set dynamically because I do not want to have to manually set this flag for every single object that's pinned/exempt.

An ideal solution for all of this would be to have an action to 'freeze' or 'unfreeze' an object, and have it go into zero-CPU mode. I noticed Ashley looked into this in another thread but it seems like it was abandoned in favour of the 'recreate initial objects' action.
- sqiddster
- - Joined 5 Sep, 2011
  - 173 topics • 3,166 posts
- 1
- 7 Aug, 2015
- Quote
Eisenhans the layout has about 2000 objects. 'engine' CPU usage is about 30% with that many objects. You're correct, it's not a rendering issue, and render cells are on.
AllanR Good point however I also want to be able to make some objects exempt even if they might not be pinned to anything. And yeah, you're probably right, it's not too much to worry about probably.