Maybe some analogue in Construct 2? In any form? No?

Awesome, zyblade!

It's just too basic in my opinion.

In short - yes, you can. Don't have Classic on pc atm

set Var = Sprite.X / Sprite.Y (so you have proportions now)

Sprite.X = Random(whatyouprefer) + minimumwidth

Sprite.Width / Var

This will keep it proportional.

Can be a bit wrong (but i dont think so), anyway you've got the idea

This feature was bundled with Construct Classic, so I suppose it should be same way for Construct 2. I'm tired of recoloring same animations just for different HUE/SAT values.

CryEngine will use Beam's soft body physicshttp://beamng.com/

Cool. Will be implemented in Construct like No.25 :)

Maybe "if balanced, then destroy some stuff at collision"

Weebly is way too simplified => way too limited (my experience, true story)

Also CSS3 and HTML5 isn't too complicated. HTML5 is even simplier than HTML4 (i mean simple website, not all HTML5 fancy features)

This one shouldn't be compared to C2 as Isogenic Eng. is requiring coding :P

I want grid snap for action points

it is true, ive read ridiculous amount on it guys.. but obviously the game cant be utter sh*te.

I want to believe that

<IMHO>

Stecyl LOOKS more polished to me (even with all this mess in UI, i mean polished graphics);

It runs on wide range of platforms;

It WILL support HTML5 in the future (well, as said officially);

The game creating process seems more fluent, instead of Scirra's.

The difference between Construct 2 and Stency is that Stencyl gives community what they demand right now (step-by-step in every direction), while Construct is growing in one direction (with huge step), then in another (another huge step).

But I love Construct for better UI, for "no Flash" reason, for pricing system (though I dont want it to be cheap, cause there's no subscription, so no community growing - no money for devs).

</IMHO>