okey if you guys feel like wanting to argue over such a trival matter i will participate.
[quote:ntfzdotp]Why are you asking if people find this usefull or not if you tell them it is and they shouldn't say it isn't
quote me where exactly i am asking about people opinion regarding enlisted tools (aside from poll - it doesnt count)
[quote:ntfzdotp]I told you : it may be helpful for others, but it would be better if you were giving the most interesting softwares in this list instead of several generators.
oh, so now you want to tell what i should include in my own thread...? maybe instead you should just make one yourself? ever though about it?
besides - i talk within the borders of my own knowledge. are you really expecting me to talk about quantum physics when i have absolutly no knowledge in this area? because thats EXACTLY what you just said.
I am the one who choose whats interesting for myself. you plan to argu with that...?
[quote:ntfzdotp]By the way, you asked what a terrain would look like in 3ds max... sure. But this isn't the interest
of having such a software. I personnally use 3d suites like blender or max to create both 3d and 2d assets. And this way, I can make animations in 8 directions in no time compared to classical animation :
Again, please quote where i am "curious" about "what terrain would look like in 3ds max". Last time i checked i am endlessly babbling about "time" needed to get the assets.
And of course your creation WILL look better and WILL be better in all possible aspects then pre-generated. But ask yourself... how long it took you - to get where you are currently, in 3d modelling and designing. Months? years?
Now those programs needs barely minutes or hours.
[quote:ntfzdotp]you're asking people their opinion, you get them, even if they don't follow the way you think. Also, you can always say things politely. Being rude = being aggressive.
two words: "quote me". where i am "asking for opinion".
About being rude: i give what i recive. nothing more and nothing less. A group of people had been constantly rude towards me so dont expect me to bring flowers and cake. But why would you care eh? after all, its soo much easier to just think of me as "agresive rude unpolite brute".
But think what you want. Its a free world after all.
[quote:ntfzdotp]Newt is speaking of particle systems
sorry but i dont have mind reading powers and to me this:
[quote:ntfzdotp]all these different apps
[quote:ntfzdotp]apps that do most of that stuff using Construct
does NOT equal "particle systems". otherwise he would just say "hey those particles can be made in construct" right? thats quite logical, wouldnt you agree?
and let me point this AGAIN:
i dont care if you find those tools cool or not - the creators dont pay me for their creation advertisment on this forums. but i disagree with biased statements which Newt said.
ANY engine, not only Construct - when mastered, can create wonders.
But this tools are not for the masters. They are for begginers and casual game dev hobbysts.
just like myself - who happends to find them very usefull and fun to work with.
so will you please drop this pointless, trivial and needless discussion or will you keep forcing me to prove that i am not a camel...?