IJCT's Forum Posts

    i can totally agree with this, 2 days of nothing that really matters, we want to see new features ASAP!!

    Scirra needs a better marketing guy (if there is any) look how Game Maker 2 did, a lot of videos only about the new features in the firts day.

  • Doesn't this solve most of that?

    "Being browser-based, the UI style can be modified using CSS. We're keen to add a custom theming system to allow anyone to edit the appearance!"

    no, if there are no lines, there is no CSS to replace, the "custom" interface we can do its just replace already created assets of the interface and colors.

  • You do not have permission to view this post

  • No, i have sound engineers in my team and believe me, its better to have your own standalone software for music, its way more complicated than you may think..

  • but webgl does support 3D graphics , so a plugin can fulfill the 3D part

    is not that easy, there are sooooo much stuff than just adding a Z coordinate to an engine.

    Scirra is looking to build the best 2d game maker at the moment, 3D is something we all asked once, sadly the answer is no.

  • its exactly the same as the one we already have...

    edit: and i just noticed that the lines between an event and a subevent are gone, many people have dyslexia (i do) and

    it will be impossible to know wich subevent belongs to an event when you have a bunch of sub-sub-sub events on screen.

    https://www.scirra.com/images/c3/c3-windows-events.png

  • How about calling it ReConstruct 2: Now in the cloud!

    the thing with a name like that is that as Jayjay said, its basically the same Construct 2, its not "a new fresh product", its more like of a new service for Game Developers who uses Construct 2 rather than a new piece of software, so its just a tool.

  • i solved the problem with your solution and some extra tweking, but yeah apple is the one that created the error but in other engines it work just fine :/

  • how it does gonna work? a server will export the game for us? and if it does, all the game files will have to be uploaded to the cloud, then compiled and after that downloaded??? i mean, if my game DLIFO took 25 minutes to export each time for cordova, now i will have to use the speed of my internet to upload the project and download it again??? here in latin america the most normal speed is 5MB!!

    so lets say we have a project that is around 120MB, C3 will have to upload it all to a cloud using my internet speed for upload that is around 2MB, that means around 15minutes waiting, then waiting who know how much for the project to compile and then after that i still have to wait more so its get downloaded with my same low internet speed???

    how this was a good idea??

  • this bug was never fixed, Construct 2 currently doesn't support a good iOS export method.

  • so C3 is basically C2 but in a browser, so yeah, a name change is a good idea now.

    A problem we've always had is finding other ways to drive revenue. Asset store profit we make wouldn't cover even 1 employees salary/costs, and there are ~8 of us at the moment. It's a nice thing to have to help, but will never come close to our core product.

    Secondly, our strength is that we do mainly focus on our core product! Spending our time creating assets/templates etc to sell would ultimately take away from that. We'd rather just play to our strengths.

    what if Construct 3 is a one time payment for desktop builds and if people want to use it on chrome then pay a fee??

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads

  • im not paying money to a charity, im paying money for a software no matter how many people or how they did it.

  • i see the new "construct 3" more like a service or online tool that will improve development rather than a new engine.

  • Change the name of Construct 3 to Construct Cloud Services (or something related to cloud services)

    the Construct 3 game engine as how far as it looks is just a cloud service that will do exactly the same that Construct 2 does, there is no "3" or move forward, or big change to call it a sequel, i see this more of a new tool than an entire new engine that will shadow Construct 2