"Necrophobia" performance test.

This forum is currently in read-only mode.

Replies Disabled

❤Follow Topic(15)

0 favourites

26 posts
- 1
- 2

From the Asset Store

Firebase Utilities PRO- Analytics, Dynamic Links, Remote Config, Performance, Crashlytics

$12 USD

Firebase: Analytics, Dynamic Links, Remote Config, Performance, Crashlytics on Android, iOS & Web Browser

Sparsha

- Genesys
- - Joined 7 May, 2009
  - 28 topics • 193 posts
- 1
- 22 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Hi,

can someone try this test and give me feedback about the performance?

There aren't FPS: just say me if it renders slow or fast, what's your performance for 1 minute play, and what's your hardware.

Thanks in advance.

https://files.getdropbox.com/u/1105488/test01.rar
- Radyth
- - Joined 7 Jul, 2009
  - 0 topics • 27 posts
- 1
- 22 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Ran really well for me.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ 3GHz

3GB RAM

GeForce 8800GT
- Genesys
- - Joined 7 May, 2009
  - 28 topics • 193 posts
- 1
- 22 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Nice, thanks!
- kalzekdor
- - Joined 22 Jul, 2009
  - 1 topics • 4 posts
- 1
- 22 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Destroyed my laptop. But, it's a worthless junk pile, 1.7ghz processor, 1gb ram, and no video card to speak of. It's not exactly efficient, but if it's not meant to run on low end systems, I understand. I'll test it out on my desktop if I get the chance.
- Porlo
- - Joined 28 Jul, 2008
  - 5 topics • 71 posts
- 1
- 22 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Runs well.

Intel core 2 duo 2.4GHz

4Gb ram

Geforce 9700m 512mb
- Genesys
- - Joined 7 May, 2009
  - 28 topics • 193 posts
- 1
- 22 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Yeah, it's meant to run on newer system.. Thanks kalzekdor and Porlo.
- Doppel
- - Joined 19 Jan, 2008
  - 29 topics • 718 posts
- 1
- 22 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Q6600 quad core

2gb ram

HD4850

from 122~145fps so very smooth
- Ashley Construct Team Founder
- Moderator
- - Joined 21 May, 2007
  - 669 topics • 30,331 posts
- 1
- 22 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Runs pretty slow on my laptop with ATI Radeon mobility HD 3470. I can't see what would be slowing it down so much though. Are you using blurs a lot? They're the slowest shader.
- Genesys
- - Joined 7 May, 2009
  - 28 topics • 193 posts
- 1
- 23 Jul, 2009
- Quote
No, not really.. I'm using blur just for the layer effect, with glow effect, greyscale plus and tint plus. I had an HD 4350 before and those low end cards are really shitty..
- madster
- - Joined 17 Feb, 2009
  - 77 topics • 1,412 posts
- 1
- 23 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Smooth for me, card did get to work though (fan spinning faster).

AMD 2.5 Quad

Radeon HD4870

4Gb RAM
- Davioware
- - Joined 25 Sep, 2008
  - 64 topics • 1,196 posts
- 1
- 23 Jul, 2009
- Quote
didn't run at 60 fps, and I like games to run buttery smooth.

dual 1.8 intel

8300 GS 128 MB

2 GB ram

Take the blur out and it will run much better; your window is a bit too large for a full screen blur pass.
Try Construct 3

Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.
Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
- Caspis Sinclair
- - Joined 7 Apr, 2008
  - 45 topics • 401 posts
- 1
- 23 Jul, 2009
- Quote
It actually ran fairly smoothly on my old PC. Not 60fps but it wasn't jerky by any means.

3ghz Athlon XP

512mb ram

Radeon 9800pro

WinXP
- Genesys
- - Joined 7 May, 2009
  - 28 topics • 193 posts
- 1
- 23 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Thank you all. Davio: I'll just make the graphics scalable
- ZOMGBananas
- - Joined 25 Jun, 2009
  - 3 topics • 14 posts
- 1
- 24 Jul, 2009
- Quote
Didn't run too badly on my laptop here, only a little bit of jerkiness when the layout moves, that's about it.

Lappy specs -

Intel Core Duo T5550 (1.83ghz)

2 GB DDR2 RAM

nVidia 8600M GS (256mb)

Windows Vista
- Jayjay
- - Joined 18 Mar, 2008
  - 26 topics • 2,290 posts
- 1
- 24 Jul, 2009
- Quote
It ran alright for me, not too smooth but still playable.

Specs:

Intel P4 2.8ghz

128mb Intel(R) 910GL gfx card

1.2gb ram

Windows XP