You can still use "pick top" condition from the z order while using a family.

sounds good

Was just a first thought, but perhaps a Family would be better, with the block types in it, then just pick instance with index 0, or something like that

Loop through the instances with a For each, checking each for the value. Set a local variable to 1 or something, if any of them are not the value required. Then after the loop check that var.

Won't work because they are 2 different object types. You could add a local non-static variable 'destroyed' or similar, and set it to 1 if you destroy the yellow block, then don't destroy the green if it = 1

Even when using Visual Studio I never got into the dark styles.

Funkumo you can customize buttons with CSS, check the manual for Button. But yeah, you can generate button-like images pretty easily, even with free online tools.

You can change the theme in preferences. I prefer the light as well

So now I know what's been keeping you busy lately Will look out for a new demo.

oh ok

Looks like yours is a little different. The other one is a grid of rectangular blocks. Anyway in event 14 you are setting the Circle position twice in succession. Also if you have the full license, use a Family and put the TopBlock, etc. in it. This will remove events 7, 8, 9 (6 will be changed to use the Family). When I say its overkill, I mean you just need to remember an x,y position (where to move the circle to). That's IF yours is similar to the other project (which is hard to tell from a screenshot).

Ashley There are a few object expressions you can retrieve when using "Compare two values", but not through the object itself.

Sometimes you have neither, like scale (e.g. Sprite, SpriteFont)

Why does this look so similar to

BTW I fixed it for the other person and removed most of the code, including those Else blocks. The array is overkill really. So was I doing someone's homework? Also I would make the 'TopBlock, etc.' smaller and remove the need for the inverted 'is overlapping' checks.