If you remove the AD_ID permission (which you must do to comply with the Family program), you must also change your declaration in the console that your app do no use the AD_ID.
Now you have removed the permission, but still declared that you will use it, that's why you get the latest notification.
Regarding the first notification you obviously seem to have filled in your Data Safety form that your app do not collect or share any data at all, this is of course not true (then no ads would even work). That's why you got that notification.
Here you can see what ADMOB collect: developers.google.com/admob/android/privacy/play-data-disclosure
Update both Chrome and C3, and see if it makes any difference.
Are you working in r225 ??
The window in your print screen is for ATT tracking, and this is just an information message (the IDFA explainer), to open the system alert. This window is not where you define if you allow it or not. The ios developer guide tells you to just have one button that states Continue. This is exactly what you get if you use the Google messages. It also just state Continue, and when pressed you get the ATT prompt.
See this example:
I think you are confused with the GDPR message, but this is not it.
You can export apps directly from the C3 editor with mobile ads, witout buying any external plugin yes.
The part most people fail at is doing the Admob setup in the google console. Not the events in C3, they are very basic.
Any news about this ? I just tried to export my new project on Google Play Console with the Mobile Billing from Playfab but the version is outdated
Mobile Billing is not a Scirra plugin.
There is 4 bug reports for this issue already. So either use the old version, or wait for next beta.
Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.
you should write meta-tags manually and add them to the html page.
convert the ttf to woff, import it, and use it as a web font.
I also found an inconsistency on the forum, manual and/or tutorial examples regarding the Android application ID: Should it use the / or ~ sign in between the code? e.g. ca-app-pub-0000000000000000/0000000000 VS ca-app-pub-0000000000000000~0000000000
I also found an inconsistency on the forum, manual and/or tutorial examples regarding the Android application ID: Should it use the / or ~ sign in between the code?
e.g. ca-app-pub-0000000000000000/0000000000 VS ca-app-pub-0000000000000000~0000000000
APP ID is like ca-app-pub-0000000000000000~0000000000
AD ID is like ca-app-pub-0000000000000000/0000000000
Search for this code (will be in a frameworks.sh file)
source="$(readlink "${source}")"
and replce with the following (see the -f added):
source="$(readlink -f "${source}")"
Clear your build folder and clean errors, then rebuild (Archive).
Try again now, should be solved
Member since 6 Jun, 2016