Hi Max,

Just tried with my project and exported to Mac64 using latest Chromium (as per exporter). Used all default options ticked.

After also popping up with unidentified developer, I went to system prefs said open anyway, typed in password and it opened.

I think there is another problem somewhere perhaps.

Hello all, I wanted to ask if it's available for Linux, this would include the full version. Apologies if this is in the wrong category.

No but Construct 3 is available on Linux.

Shouldn't it be more like how the Else works?

This condition block, Or this other block condition.

Yeah that's how it will make more sense to me as well.

I feel they must actually focus on getting the C3 runtime out ASAP so we can get busy with maturing C3. There will have to be porting and developing of addons / plugins yet again?

I was straddling 2 competing products....C3 and another one, but currently C3 is winning out primarily because of speed of creation. I can do things much quicker in here than in the other tool, however, if they bring some of the features and speed of the runtime in - I don't think I'll be using the other product for my main development tool, esp if the features from the wishlist being voted for gets implemented (Few of them are "Wait for new runtime.", lots of ones "Undecided." )

Either way I'm really excited for the new runtime and new features since I reckon this has been what was needed after C2.

I would also say the price is not the issue with regards to Construct 3.

Its great and you will be on your way to making games in no time.

If however you really have something against subs...instead of the Gamemaker option rather try Clickteam Fusion 2.5. Also no coding needed. And non Subscription based. With Fusion 3 on the horizon that promises a lot.

Both Construct 3 and Fusion 2.5 has pros and cons when comparing them to one another.

I seem to find Constructs way of doing the events and add-ons a little bit more intuitive and quicker.

VS GameSalad I'll take Construct 2 or 3 any day of the week and twice on Weekends

VS other tools....there may be more of a fair fight.

>

> Uhm...how can you blame C3 / Scirra for your "logistics" by being at work and not being able to work on C3? Scirra can't be responsible for when and how you can use the software only for potential issues you may be having. Posting about how you can and can't work and losing time and wasting your SUB just silly ...

>

So just so I'm clear; I should not be complaining that a service that I am paying for is not avaialable when I have time to use it? That's your stance?

In that case; if I book a vacation for when I'm not working, then turn up at the hotel to take the vacation, and I am then told that my room isn't available, but it was last week (when I was working) - that's OK with you guys?

What's going on here? Am I honestly the "bad guy" because I want a working environment that I'm PAYING for?

I think there is a misunderstanding here.

It's more akin to you pay for a room at a hotel and we also get access to the bar, you get there, you are shouting in the foyer saying that the bar is not open and no one is serving drinks. Yet I go there and they are open and serving drinks, another member joins me and another...and before long the bar is full. Yet you are still in the foyer shouting. Then leave saying you don't have time this week to go to the bar to check if its open.

If you try and access C3 and not available of course there is an issue. If the build service is unavailable of course there is an issue if you have notified them or tried again, and they did not investigate.

I'm currently building a product and I'm using it on and off every few days in a row. So far I have not had issues. I'm sure many would have noticed and complained as well.

What I suggest is going on the forum saying the date and time it was unavailable and explain the issue without bringing in the wasted time of a subscription. Then also file the bug.

That way you get a clear message out and we get Scirra to investigate. Should someone else have the same issue we can add it to that bug and or post.

If we had unlimited time, as on C2, I'd agree. But if I'm being charged per annum, without main features working, the things I'm paying for need to work as its my time that is ticking away.

[quote:2dhre2eq]Thanks - but Im back in work and unable to work on C3 until the weekend.....and another subscription week passes.

Uhm...how can you blame C3 / Scirra for your "logistics" by being at work and not being able to work on C3? Scirra can't be responsible for when and how you can use the software only for potential issues you may be having. Posting about how you can and can't work and losing time and wasting your SUB just silly and takes the focus off the build issue you may or may not be having.

They decided on Sub model. It wont change. We have been there. You can either move on, or wait for another tool to launch or focus on the issues of C3, but for the love of all things Construct can we stop the subscription model discussions. It just wastes your and Scirra's time.

P.S I was also not happy about the SUBS but I decided the Pro's outweigh the Con's for me in the next year or two at least.

Probably the fastest/best to try contact that Dev and ask if he could or if there are any plans to convert it?

Looks great!

Great to see this. Typewriter effect is very needed in my current project. Currently using a 3rd party plugin that I can soon remove.

I'd really like to see Scirra add more functionality in Construct going forward.

Great job. I might actually have to renew my sub if it keeps on going like this

Yeah but lots of ideas there and voted for with "No Status" since day 1.

Voted fwiw.