Hard to write documentation for a developing product. Just ask Deadeye how his tutorial is doing.

Who cares? I would assume the families of 911 victims care, and most of the people who have family fighting in one of the 80 wars going on loosely related to 911.

How many innocents have been killed or jailed in the name of 911? How many victims is the so-called war on terror responsible for? Does it justify the casualties of 911?

American pride is blind for the ugly side of coin.

Some crook took the bullet and died. Who cares? Move on and make more games.

Should make a game featuring these as levels

Figure that is because everyone wants a slice of the cake Google is having.

Yowza!

Voronoi noise reminds me of this:

http://simblob.blogspot.com/2010/09/pol ... art-3.html

You need to look under file extensions (namely .png), the shell stuff is for right click context menu.

Don't you have to get that UI library somehow in order to work on Construct 0.x?

Easy. Add platform behavior to it, tick solid. Everything that a behavior requires should be provided by the behavior itself.

That way you could have moving platforms etc., sprites that act as solid ground to walk onto (viking with up shield) etc

What if someone wanted an object to not become solid at some time? What if he wanted to make the object solid for some, but not solid for others (ghosts)? Hardcoded attributes would be a bad idea, as they wouldn't be as flexible as a behavior.

hotling-protect.jpg? I don't think we're seeing what we were meant to see

Got a stackexchange.com - like community driven Q&A system?

Or use variables.

Hard-coded attributes that can't be altered at runtime are kind of... pointless.

In fact, attributes are redundant. I'd rather see the missing essential features to be developed before redundant features like attributes.

Just my 2 cents