Make sure to watch it in HD. Same game I was working on a month ago or so, just more stuff now. Things have really progressed.

Upgraded weapons system with ammo, cooler background now, sfx, music, charged missile system, and some VERY rudimentary enemy AI (right now) that flies at you, shoots, and flies away (either to the background or foreground) after a given amount of time passes. Also the HUD is a little better, and it has some cool SpriteFont effects, for instance typed out gun information whenever you switch weapons,next to the ammo numbers. I don't think anyone will actually read that stuff, but it looks cool on the HUD.

One thing that isn't in the video is the cool zooming effects. They're still there I just turned them off for the stuff in the middle of the game for some reason while I was recording the video. >_< lol.

That is looking really, really nice. I agree with the comment on the video about some minor alteration to show which enemies are actually attackable, though. And what will be in place of the ? blocks?

This doesn't seem to be working on 0.99.72? <img src="http://sslaxx.twu.net/Sonic360PlusPlatformScrewy.jpg"> is what I'm getting trying to run it.

> In that video his frame rate is constantly below 60 also his animations suck.....

>

Hey, no need to be offensive about someone's work just because they're using a potentially competing program. Surely how good your animations are doesn't depend on the tool you use?

I may not agree with the philosophy behind Stencyl, but hey, it's a free world and each to their own. I want to make sure these forums are always a friendly place (which sadly seems quite rare on the internet) - ideally someone from Stencyl, Game maker and such could drop in with a few posts without being shouted down.

Better than some of the competition, then.

Strange changes, to my mind. Usually more users, more messages lead to a bigger forum with more moderators/admins. Construct grows constantly, there is no need to reduce this forum. Maybe, time to increase the number of mods?

P.S. just my private (paranoid-like) question - are there any reasons out-of-public discussion?

No, just some parts of the forum have been turned into sub-sections. Doesn't look as if anything's been deleted.

Still, it's better than Game Editor's logo... just.

I wouldn't really call this free, you know - the so-called "free" edition amounts to nothing more than a demo. Though I wouldn't call the (full) Pro option expensive, either. In either case it's a fancy RAD front-end to devkitARM. Might give the demo a shot, I guess.

Sounds good to me. Fewer forums to click "Mark as read" on

Isn't that what "Mark forums read" - - is for?

Oh dear. Not exactly useful is it? Perhaps we could persuade them to try using Construct?

Hey, if I could knock up a logo using OpenClipart items and some lower-case text, think they'll pay me $250? Actually, my artistic talent is nil and I'm sure I could better than the winner!

Attitude's condition, at the moment, is pretty questionable Candescence, so mentioning it seems pointless. As for the technique, most of the results that appear seem to be so far either theoretical or for non-realtime applications.

[quote:aidmkyn1]Look at this page http://www.freesound.org/whatIsFreesound.php and you could sure that all audio content there released under the CC Sampling Plus License.

But their site (not sounds) is under the CC 2 license that you've mentioned above

oops my bad.

[quote:aidmkyn1]Always amusing seeing people whine about licensing.

Not really complaining, I just don't understand how someone could be so hard up for credit that they have to make a hundred variations of flatulence.

That is somewhat bizarre, yes...

Always amusing seeing people whine about licensing.