A lack of "ease of use" features doesn't really suggest no interest, however +1 for adding more programmers.
On the other hand that could also mean an increase in the price.
Also keep in mind that one of the key features is "ease of use" for people new to programming, and a higher price point could hinder that.
I'm thinking less company, more institution, amirite?
Not sure if I should ask if op has a C2 license, but it should be said that you can't export to to mobile, or even make money off C2 games without one.
Yea, but how would it pick a specific instance from the top tier?
As with all picking, just saying object do foo, makes all, or just the first instance do it.
So basically its the same either way, an extra condition, or an extra action.
Better to have a few breaking changes, then have to deal with crippling legacy/ backwards compatibility.
Did you make a bug report?
Ok, maybe not. It might look pretty, but it would be hard to make it interactive.
Just had a thought.
How about doing it in Spriter?
Whats wrong with just using the Sign behavior?
Um that's some fuzzy math you're using there, C2 is $129.99 for everything, where Fusion is $415.36 for all its extras.
Not to mention the free version is free.
Resizing to 8*8 may not help anything if the sprites tiled do not fit into a power of two well.
Also any thing third party could slow things down as well, leaderboards, scripts, notifications, etc.
You're not describing anything that would be directly related to the different types of export, so you will need to provide more info.
jayderyu
It was XBMC over Websockets, but the api includes calls that can use ajax.
All kinds of devices support it, Apple Tv to Raspberry Pi.
Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.
I made a tv remote, and am thinking of doing an asset store.
Dividing by zero?
Yeah, its a bug, but any other outcome would be anticlimactic.