BROO's Forum Posts

  • [quote:2rz3ascv]Buddy walks in

    "Do you sell Playstation 2 and Xbox consoles?"

    Not like I want to buy, but do you sell them?

  • Getting 20 from about 700 and it doesn't go lower after that.

  • I know people having enough theorethical knowledge to do BigDog.

    BigDog is advanced walker, but don't bring any revolution to movement. It's a matter of time there's BigGepard invented hunting down "bad guys" and stuff.

    Adam did the work he was supposed to do. The only thing that could be considered innovative is that he probably had to guess by himself what kind of mathematical model (NN model) to use to solve problem. But from reading that short article I'm not sure if Adam is even able to think about using techniques to solve problem.

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
  • This is still just an artficial intelligence. You should get yourself interested in Neural Networks to find out that these tasks Adam's capable of, aren't really that innovative. Of course, costs of making such instrument are large, but that's because of big memories (well... maybe not so big, probably 0.000001% of brains memory capacity ^^) needed to handle simple tasks.

    Neural Network means a lot of math and it kinda looks like our neural system, but it's simplified. To very accurately simulate single real neuron's work, you'd have to evaluate thousands of differentional equations. Simulation on rat's brain is possible for supercomputers just for few seconds. We're nowhere near to making any real intelligence.

    If people were given such motoric abilities BigDog possesses, they'd also forget about falling on slippery places. But again, this stuff is "quite easy" (meaning there are at last 100 teams on Earth capable of creating it) to make an ideal model, but quite hard to get sponsors for it ^^.

  • Try this comparison CAP:

    http://www.republika.pl/tymczasownik/loops_test.cap

    Layout1: manual

    Layout2: "for" loop

    Layout3: action: "start loop"

    Distortion map is ran 10^5 times and profiler retrieves time used to do those operations (output in text).

    As for my machine, the results for 1st method were about 4x better than Lay2 and Lay3.

  • There's should be only one instance. Probably the icons from taskbar doesn't disappear. Move mouse over them and they should go away.

  • AFAIK Camas' Russian too.

  • Polish Mafia again.

  • Actually I started to like it from about 5th minute. Hey, that's really enjoyable song! ^^'

  • Nice effect.

    I don't quite get how it works. Is there a possibility to adapt this effect into non-circular shapes?

  • This is "don't know what to say". I'd go with that its your machine that is source of evil :--). Maybe graphics acceleration is involved in these strange crashes?

  • Polish Mafia ^^'.

    ...

    I liked it. Maybe to little diversity, but this game's quite solid. Good graphics, good musics. Looking forward to seeing you making some serious stuff.

  • If you use action "play animation", animation restarts. You only see first frame of astronaut's animation because it's restarted all the time. Try using some events where you put "Trigger once while true" to sort it out.

  • Same here .

  • Getting rid of bugs is now at higher priority than adding new functionalities.

    On the other hand I think that most of us have his/her own techniques when dealing with data. If everyone's wishes were fulfilled, you'll get your bitwise operations, but also 10 other techniques for handling values (flags system/stacks/queues/lists/dictionaries/pointers/some weird data management templates used by 1 person on the world/other stuff), what would make Construct messy. Simplicity is key for success here.