3D Scirra! Who would pay for that!

Hi all! <img src="smileys/smiley4.gif" border="0" align="middle">

In this Post the question is raised if there will ever be a 3D alternative to scirra Construct2.

I have chosen for a simple solution for this mather, because the conversation in that post evolves in "will never work/will work" and so on.

It really comes down to the simple question.

Who of us would buy a simplified 3d game building environment if it "where possible" & made by scirra.

The least we can do is inform scirra with the numbers.

Numbers that say "yes" i would invest money into that!

So please understand that explaining why it "is not possible" in a ever growing software evolution is rather unnecessary to reply.

If your answer is "yes".

Then reply saying.

(I Do) & (I would pay "x amount" for it)

If your answer is "no"

Then be so kind and dont reply <img src="smileys/smiley20.gif" border="0" align="middle">.

So i say.

(I Do) & (I would pay at least 200 euro's)

Thats 200 euro's in the pocket for shure!

So who's next.

I do and would pay the same amount they have going for the 2D one....

But yeah, if they do, they need to change the name from C2 to Construct 2D and Construct 3D respectively.

I would pay for it, but having 2 separate products would be a mistake IMO. 3d could be incorpated into c2, or into the 'next version' of c2 - instead of calling it c3 it could be called c3D or something, but there would still only be one product like photoshop going from cs2 to cs3.

With 3d incorporated into it rather than two separate products, that way you get the best of both, can blend 2d and 3d together in the games made with it, and it would likely be much easier for Ashley to develop. It could possibly be integrated using one of the open source 3d js libraries like box2d was.

It's all speculative though, since 3d hasn't been confirmed anyway.

As for the rest of us, this post is not meant for opinion.

Please stick to

(I Do) & (I would pay "x amount" for it)

So scirra can get an easy headcount <img src="smileys/smiley20.gif" border="0" align="middle" />

While the results of this post might be interesting, it probably won't change what we do, because we won't have time to implement any 3D features until the long term future.

Ashley

That i understand.

Therefore, it is not meant to change minds, or the way u work.

Just a honest perspective without all the technobabble.

Definitely willing to pay for it, but I cannot discuss price.

Would I be willing to pay more than, say, UDK? Yes, if the quality is there.

If it's able to produce something like this (that is, a little bit more basic than unity):

<img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-VPgn3SUa9rY/Tz36PnV-i3I/AAAAAAAAERw/qNK0xm97cdY/s1600/Download+PC+Games+Alien+Breed+-+Impact+2010+For+Free+4.jpg" border="0" />

then I'd definitely consider paying over $200 for an indie version, and over $2K for a commercial version.

If we're talking about this

<img src="http://img.brothersoft.com/screenshots/softimage/0/3d_games_tvmax-30029-1.jpeg" border="0" />

or this

<img src="http://blog.mozilla.org/labs/files/2012/04/no-comply.png" border="0" />

then I wouldn't be willing to pay anything for it, and I would think less of construct.

I'm not expecting the same level of detail as cryengine or UDK, of course.

Ya, any amount.

Yes, I would be interested in even basic 3d features being added.