RBuster's Recent Forum Activity

  • Ok. Thank you, —

    So, I just need to use the action "set group PatternGen.Pattern

    activated" (in my case, in the last but one action) , right?

    I intend to turn off the group with an action (last one) inside it. This is regarding with my other question: could I use an expression like "this.group" to deactivated the current group?

  • Thank you for the sample, — I understand now how can I associate the generated value to the group. There remained only one question regarding the last action that you included in the project, activating "pattern.gen" group. I need to include the first commands (on start of layout) also within a group to control them?

  • blackhornet

    I thought the plugin combining an address (such as "i5" for example) to the value that was generated by the plugin, according to the order. I intended to link these addresses to the groups to which they were activated in the order they were generated by Pattern Gen. If this is not possible, then I do not know how to do this. Could you give me some suggestion?

  • Hi —

    I had seen the CAPX with the plugin sample. The problem is I don't know how to access the addresses to compare the value and activate the respective group.

  • Raganork: I've read in other posts that you always indicates the Pattern Gen plugin and offers to help. Could you help me? I need to know how can I access the values that are generated with Pattern Gen. Thanks anyway.

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads

  • Thanks, — The Pattern Gen is a very nice plugin. I believe that this result can be stored in memory, correct? How can I do to have access to these memory addresses? It would, for example, i1, i2, i3, until it reaches the total quantity of numbers that were generated?

    And with respect to the use of an expression to determine the current group is activated/deactivated? Is there any?

    Thanks again.

  • Let's go to another attempt. I would just like to know how can I do to randomize values ??without any repetition, until all have been drawn. Could someone only suggest the way?

    Regarding the other question, I would just leave the programming more independent and just only replicate it, instead of editing one by one.

    I really hope someone can give me some help.

    Thank you

  • Hi everybody,

    I have 20 groups and each has to be activated randomly. These groups can only be randomized and executed again after all are performed. How can I do to avoid repetition?

    One more question: I want to disable each group after the actions are performed. I wonder if I can use an expression to disable the current group (Eg this.group) instead of having to write the name of each in the action "set group X Deactivated"

    Thanks for any help.

  • RenatoB Are you enabling asm.js physics in construct2? Ashley's blog says that will be better on Android.

    IntelRobert

    Thanks for the reply. I had not tested with arm.js enabled. Before was Box2D web, but even enabling had no difference. My game has 32 instances of a cube with physics behavior. At first, when they fall (cubes), the frame rate is 1 fps. Then rises to 4 and end stabilizes at 15 fps.

  • Thanks, —

  • I have a question for those that have run compiled and run an APK.

    Do you have Physics.

    What was your FPS.

    from the two video's shown the FPS were two ends of the spectrum. However I noticed that the slow game was likely using Physics and the fast game wasn't. Now of course this may not be a factor at all. However we know that Physics integration often is a hit or miss especially at the moment as C2 is movig to use an ASM.js version of Box2D.

    jayderyu: You got some information about physic behavior and Crosswalk?

    I tested a game with physics in Crosswalk and the behavior has improved, but is still a bit slow. In Cocoon was much worse.

    I really need to fix it. Does IntelRobert could help us?

  • So who knows. maybe, but I believe Intel is looking into that.

    I hopefully yes

    Thanks for the information.

RBuster's avatar

RBuster

Early Adopter

Member since 29 Oct, 2012

Twitter
RBuster has 2 followers

Connect with RBuster

Trophy Case

  • 11-Year Club
  • Jupiter Mission Supports Gordon's mission to Jupiter
  • Forum Contributor Made 100 posts in the forums
  • Forum Patron Made 500 posts in the forums
  • Forum Hero Made 1,000 posts in the forums
  • Coach One of your tutorials has over 1,000 readers
  • Educator One of your tutorials has over 10,000 readers
  • Regular Visitor Visited Construct.net 7 days in a row
  • RTFM Read the fabulous manual
  • Email Verified

Progress

20/44
How to earn trophies