Chadori's Recent Forum Activity

  • To be honest, I wouldn't want Construct 3 to be 3D.

    That means, if it were 3D. The simple drag & drop to layout would be gone. And we'll have instead the XYZ based drag&drop editing, which is kind of counter-intuitive for 2D games.

    Unless, 2 & 3 Dimensional Editors were to be separated.

    Although, that is just the start of the problem. Realistically, maintenance would be way slower given the Construct Team is just a small team and a 3D Editor requires more to maintain and innovate.

    It's easy to think that "Wow. It's easy to use Construct 3. Imagine if it were 3D too, it would be great. " But people sometimes don't understand that the reason it is easy to use is because it is mainly made to be easy-2D in the first place.

    That's just my say on the subject.

  • Nice guide. Worth reading to. +1

  • NetOne It looks like you still haven't filed a bug report. Please report this, but if you can't, I'll report it for you. This needs to get fixed.

  • The link on your website for the official C2 manual isn't working:

    https://www.scirra.com/manual/150/manual.zip

    It says "Download the Official Construct 2 Manual (2.2mb)" but it just links back to the website. I'm going to be going on a 7 month western Pacific deployment soon and won't have internet during most of that timeframe, so I won't have a way to reference the online manual. Is this offline manual hosted anywhere else?

    Your Construct 2 application has a copy of that manual. So, you probably don't need that.

    C:\Program Files\Construct 2\manual

  • —

    We can discuss it here.

    -I am one of the member : 'ChadoriXD'

    -Invite Link : discord.com/invite/G3N57fG

  • jkh0208

    Does Construct 2 have the issue where you have to connect to the internet every 7 days to verify? I can't use Construct 3 since I'm without internet 6-8 months out of the year on average.

    No. Construct 2 is an offline application, so you don't have to update or re-login every 7 days unlike Construct 3.

    The benefit of Construct 3's online subscription is that you have constant update and support for new features, bug fixes, 3rd party compatibility, technology updates and etc. This is very essential for developers who commercialize their games.

    If you don't have internet for that long period of time and maybe constantly travel and/or are on remote places. Then, I assume you don't make commercial games and do this mainly as a hobby. Then, I do think and recommend you go with Construct 2.

    I remind you though that Construct 2 is 1.6x more expensive than it was before. And also, it is outdated and Construct 3 was made to replace Construct 2.

    Construct 3 :: $99.00 per year.

    Construct 2 Before :: $120.00. One-time payment.

    Construct 2 Now :: $199.00. One-time payment.

  • This seems great. Does this support c3runtime?

  • I use Firebase Authentication for Construct 3 but for you to use it, wouldn't that just be like using spare parts in building a car.

    Unfortunately, we don't have a Google Plus plugin for Construct 3. And I'm not even sure if there's one for Construct 2 either.

  • Ashley

    — - we don't mind discussion of competitors, but telling people to go and use different software on our own forum is a step too far. Please refrain from making such posts.

    Ohh, sorry about that. Construct 3 is excellent for startups though.

    And all of that are true.

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads

  • Admin: removed part of post telling people to use other software

    The features there is way better and Construct 3 is an incomplete product especially with the current SDK limitation, trust me!

    But if you are a startup and have low in funds... Then I guess Construct 3 is fine.

    But don't buy Construct 2 anymore, for it is outdated and currently overpriced after the price raise to encourage new users to subscribe to Construct 3 instead.

  • In the past other users have asked us to remove such warnings because they're annoying, especially when there are no references to the thing being deleted in the project.

    On Construct 2, it still has the warning.

    He means, on Construct 3, even when there are instances, the layer still gets deleted.

  • I think this is suited more as a bug. This is kind of dangerous.

    github.com/Scirra/Construct-bugs/issues

Chadori's avatar

Chadori

Member since 10 Oct, 2014

Twitter
Chadori has 50 followers

Trophy Case

  • 10-Year Club
  • Entrepreneur Sold something in the asset store
  • Jupiter Mission Supports Gordon's mission to Jupiter
  • Forum Contributor Made 100 posts in the forums
  • Forum Patron Made 500 posts in the forums
  • Forum Hero Made 1,000 posts in the forums
  • x2
    Coach One of your tutorials has over 1,000 readers
  • Regular Visitor Visited Construct.net 7 days in a row
  • Steady Visitor Visited Construct.net 30 days in a row
  • Enduring Visitor Visited Construct.net 90 days in a row
  • Unrelenting Visitor Visited Construct.net 180 days in a row
  • RTFM Read the fabulous manual
  • x2
    Great Comment One of your comments gets 3 upvotes
  • Delicious Comment One of your comments gets 10 upvotes
  • Email Verified

Progress

24/44
How to earn trophies