R0J0hound's Forum Posts

  • oraflame

    Glad it helped.

    sarierdnc

    Best to create a new topic. Generally I’m unavailable but when I am I’d just skim all the posts and reply to those that interest me, I have time for and I actually can solve. That said there are many other talented people on here that like to help out too. So a new topic is your best bet.

  • X=100*cos(ang)

    Y=100*sin(ang)

    For any angle.

  • There’s a newer version of this floating around but it must be on another topic.

    Anyways to decide what face is on rope you can do a dot product with all the face normals and the one that’s the most positive is on top.

    Typically you’d calculate the normal using three vertices from each face and doing a cross product. However since it’s a cube you can get the normal from just two vertices: one one the face and one on the opposite side of the cube.

    The strategy I’d go with is make a list of those two vertices for each face and put them in an array sized 6,4,1.

    At(I, 1) would be the first vertex, at(I,2) would be the second. For bookkeeping you’d set at(I,3) to the face value. You’d set at(I,0) to the dot product of each pair to the ground normal. Roughly:

    Dot= (v2-v1) dot vec(0,0,1)

    Then you’d sort the array and the first index will be the top face.

    That’s the general idea at least. It’s just busy work to work that out. Another idea would be to calculate the orientation and work out a formula to spit out the top face.

  • I mean you can do what you did there, screenshot the layout. You could then crop it to the layout area and scale it to what you have as the layout size in the image editor.

    An event way to possibly do it to set the canvas size to be the same as the layout size and use the snapshot canvas action to get an image. There may be some finickiness to deal with such as waiting a tick for things to update before snapshotting. You may also need to turn off full screen scaling. There may be other issues but i'm not sure. I've had issues in the past of capturing everything that way.

    Another way to snapshot the canvas one screen at a time, and then piece them together later.

    Either way you may end up with a rather large image which will be slower to download and take up more vram. It doesn't mean you can't do it but generally most games have reusable images that they place all over the level for decorations.

  • Here's one way to do it:

    dropbox.com/s/2j144iheff6rrde/lines_between_sprites.capx

    The only finicky bit is having to use pick all before being able to pick a different instance.

    Here's a variation that uses two instance variables which is a bit cleaner imo.

    dropbox.com/s/5w5xwxi1nnvgm8g/lines_between_sprites2.capx

  • You have to set the texture from a sprite every tick, or at least every time the frame changes. Otherwise it will remain on the last texture used.

  • Hi,

    No bother at all to ask questions.

    Best I recall I made it work with 640x480, so it should work with any size with the same aspect ratio. Anything else would stretch I suppose. I didn’t test with the other scaling modes so I probably didn’t account for some nuances with how they work. I don’t think there is a solution apart from modifying the plug-in. Unfortunately I’ve been prioritizing my time elsewhere as of late. So examples or plug-in modifications will be rarer, but I can still answer questions as those don’t require me to actually be at a computer.

  • One approach to see if a structure is on the ground is to start by marking the blocks touching the ground, then mark the blocks touching those, and so on. In the end you will then know which blocks are supported from the ground or not. It’s kind of like a flood fill. Search for posts by me I think I made a digging example that made unsupported blocks crumble.

    Making those objects not supported be movable is then an easy solution to have things crumble. To have them fall in chunks of connected blocks is harder. You can do more flood fills to find all the individual chunks or blocks as a first step. But the second step of connecting them together with physics isn’t really possible with the physics behavior. Best you can do is with joints but that can’t make the shapes rigid.

    To have rigid shapes the only option I can think of is to not use the physics behavior and either roll your own solution or attempt using a JavaScript library to do the physics I suppose.

  • Official support is harder as it kind of needs to work with everything else in Construct.

    Unofficial support, such as most of my examples need only to work with a small set of construct features. The limit of not being able to rotate 3dshapes on other axis's is solved with distort meshes and math, or in the plugin api draw 3d quad function, like the third party 3dobject plugin. My examples implement simplified 3d physics with events and since I'm cramming them within the free limits often take shortcuts.

    If you use javascript you could just utilize a 3d physics library. Just setup the scene with javascript and when you run the simulation you'd update the distort mesh points every frame.

    If someone chose to do that from a plugin they could likely hide much of the complexity from the user. Maybe call it dynamic3dshape. It would use some 3d physics library behind the scenes and you'd be able to set orientation and velocity of the objects and if it's static or dynamic. Bonus if it can interact with the standard 3d shape for collisions, or you could just have it interact with only dynamic3dshapes to be simpler to implement.

    In no way would official support be needed. It just takes someone interested enough to do it.

  • That sprite overlayed over the screen to simulate a flashlight is probably the simplest way.

    With the C3 engine we are pretty limited with what we can do with 3d lighting.

    Hard shadows can be possible as shown by this test. But it may not scale well with more objects.

    construct.net/en/forum/construct-3/general-discussion-7/possible-add-3d-light-172761

    Even with JavaScript there isn’t much you can do to make 3d lighting with c3’s renderer. What was done with most of the 3d stuff in C2 is another engine and renderer separate from construct was stacked on top or underneath your game. That’s what q3d did. Another option was to use constructs renderer in a way it wasn’t intended to be more integrated with the game. Rojo3d did that in c2. In c3 that is much harder, and even if a way is found to do it c3 is constantly getting updates which would require constant updates to keep the solution working.

  • It looks like it should be working. I’m out of ideas with the information provided. I probably am missing something. I’ll defer to whoever else has ideas.

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads

  • You didn’t show the event that adds to bodycount. The rest is unrelated.

    The event should look like this: 

    Badguy: hp < 0
For each badguy
— destroy badguy
— add 1 to bodycount

    Without the “for each” there could be cases where more than one bad guy has hp less than 0, but only 1 is added.

    I guess you could do this instead which would also work: 

    Badguy: hp < 0
— destroy badguy
— add badguy.pickedcount to bodycount

  • There likely can be differences with this and other plugins. The z direction could be positive in the other way. With this you can set the angle with (x,y,z) Euler angles. Other plugins could rotate in a different order like zyx. You can do that with multiple actions

    Set angle to (0,0,z)

    Rotate by (0,y,0)

    Rotate by (x,0,0)

    And like I said before to get the angle it gives it in a 3x3 matrix. You can either convert that with a formula you can find online or you can save the Euler angles to variables.

    The solution you’re after is probably some combination of the above. I’m not going to attempt a solution as this plug-in is mostly self contained and I only made sure it works with a minimal set of other construct features.

  • With this plug-in orientation is as complex or as simple as you like. You can set the orientation with the look at action, or you can rotate incrementally. Like if you like xyz angles you would rotate by x, then y and then z. I was shooting for maximum flexibility and just doing Euler angles wasn’t useful.

    The orient expressions get values from the 3x3 orientation matrix. I guess if you want to get the Euler angles you can either save them in variables as you do the rotations to access later, or there’s probably a formula for it.

  • So here is that 3d dice example revisited. The idea i had for handling collisions between die didn't pan out since the edges would still overlap. I opted for just moving the centers apart which is fine most of the time. There are probably better ways to do it.

    dropbox.com/s/ko3vy6qvc39raoh/3d_dice_v2_simple.c3p