newt's Forum Posts

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 1 Aug, 2017
  • Quote

  I'll try to do an example.

• Try Construct 3

  Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

  Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 1 Aug, 2017
  • Quote

  It doesn't matter.

  Unless you want to print it.

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 31 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  Ordinarily I would just say name the animations by their angles, and just set it that way, but you are using mirrored, so maybe do a loop and compare the int(angle/n)*n to int((360/loopindex)/n)*n

  Where the loop, and n are equal to the number of animations.

  If you have 8 animations the angles would go in increments of 45 since 360/8= 45

  So index 0= 0, index 1 = 45, 2 = 90, etc.

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 30 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  Maybe find a better street?

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 29 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  Sure. More people played it than No Man's Sky.

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 29 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  Yes, two events, perhaps less.

  http://lmgtfy.com/?q=pong

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 29 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  Pong.

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 27 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  Nope.

  The size of the objects, and texture in relation to the layout size.

  You have an eight pound cat, in a 1 gallon bag.

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 27 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  The scale you are using is too small for fullscreen imo.

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 27 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  Well I think you're scaled in a little close there. You can upscale graphics before you import them for better results, but straight lines will always have that effect.

  Also be aware different monitors will show it at different places.

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 27 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  It can happen to straight lines of any width, it can happen to a line of any length, and while you may have pixel rounding on, the scroll, and the upscale mean you still have sub-pixel placement.

  The scale probably has less to do with it than the scroll.

  That can be avoided using integer positions, which will probably look jerky.

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 27 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  Its subpixel placement. It happens when you try to render line in between whole points. It happens everywhere to everyone.

  The fix is simple, don't use crappy graphics, and don't expect lines that are 1 pixel wide to render.

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 26 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  I don't know what optimizations Ashley's introduced, but figuring the width, and height of every object has to be expensive.

  As far as post scale goes, I can't think of anything that would help as far as the system goes.

  There's a camera plug by Linkman2004 you might check out

  No idea if it does layer, or layout scales.

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 26 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  Yes, yes it would.

  If it's for a smooth zoom, add a timer with a Boolean, and stop the scaling when the zoom is complete.

• • newt
  • 
  • • Joined 12 Nov, 2008
    • 
    • 396 topics • 10,741 posts
  • 1

  • 26 Jul, 2017
  • Quote

  Its zero based, not zero default.

  There's no reason to think something that wasn't created should exist.