[quote:3n5qpiir]but it had at least large cities

Isn't that exactly what it didn't have. Based on some reviews

.

In my opinion the regions doesn't really count. And of course there was loads of other issues.

Is the mark on the window from this same behavior? Seems quite painful

What shape the object would it be? Is it any shape of polygon inside another or square?

So you read about the subject and thought it was reasonable to assume that someone did?

Do you need characters in your game that question their existence realtime?

[quote:22jp7r53]Why must it be different than a run or jump key press?

It doesn't have anything to do with the movement physics. Platform behavior is preset behavior that makes the physics like collisions easier. It is also possible to make your own platform physics using events but, that is quite advanced. That's why it is as behavior. Also changing collision box isn't something that behavior should do.

I would suggest you set Default controls from the behavior to "No". Now you have more control over the movement through events.

[quote:22jp7r53]why can't i have a down key press for a slide or duck?

Of course you can if you make it so.

[quote:22jp7r53]It would omit an extra step needed to add an animation on a DOWN button press.

If you consider ducking as an extra step then how are you gonna make any other interesting stuff happen in the game?

Conclusion. This is not a thing that the platform behavior is supposed to do and if you have questions about it you should ask in how do I section or look from tutorials.

I have one platformer tutorial there that has Mario game style ducking.

https://www.scirra.com/tutorials/753/mario-style-platform-example-with-spriter-animated-player

From events look under. Player -> Player_Controls -> Player_Controls_Common

Leaufai

Cities Skylines looks interesting. Didn't even bother with the new Sim City.

Negative angles are usually ok as well but, if you need to you can use this.

(angle(0,0,Sprite.Physics.VelocityX,Sprite.physics.velocityY)+360)%360[/code:10eqlqvk]

Listening the latest podcast, I think the future plan sounds reasonable.

http://c2podcast.com/2014/11/21/episode-6-ashley-gullen-creator-of-construct-2/

One thing I guess for C2 would be an easier way to transfer instance variables to family if you at some point realise you need that for them and don't really need those duplicate variables anymore. Or if this is already possible it would be nice if someone would enlighten me.

Don't you need a license to use real team and driver names?

Here is a very simple example you can do.

From clearly technical standpoint they don't run at the same time it is more like run Y times for X times.

If it would be a cube it would take much longer to run the whole thing.

hundredfold

Sorry I wasn't very clear. It definitely can. I just meant that even then it only affects that particular loop where you but the stop loop action. I mean C2 runs loop to the end and continues to the next event etc... Question was about all loops on the sheet.

You could use pathfinding behavior to only find the path and use some other movement type to actually move the object. Diagonal is 8 directions.

There is a third party Behavior called moveTo that might be usefull.

https://www.scirra.com/forum/behavior-moveto_t63156