Yttermayn

This reads the colour data from the canvas into the array

Canvas2.rgbaAt(loopindex("xloop"), loopindex("yloop"))

In each map group this is simply comparing the data at any given location in the array with a set colour.

"rgba(0,255,0,1)"

Green in this case.

Hope that helps <img src="smileys/smiley1.gif" border="0" align="middle" />

Tekniko

It stutters a bit in Firefox although shows 60FPS. Chrome is fine though here.

Why have you got a physics behavior on the ball?

Yttermayn

The code is set up to pick up only 100% RGB colours so Red is 255,0,0 Blue is 0,255,0 and so on.

rgba() just means Red, Blue, Green, Alpha which is the transparency of the pixel.

Hope this helps.

If you need any more info then make sure you put the symbol in front of my name <img src="smileys/smiley1.gif" border="0" align="middle" />

TELLES0808

Ha thats great, thanks so much.

<font color=blue>@Magistross lol, did!</font>. True but i am afraid it was way too complex for me to understand <img src="smileys/smiley4.gif" border="0" align="middle" />

TELLES0808

The more i look at this the better it gets. Using the method you have used would it be easy to have the junctions act like switches on/off.

Although your code looks simple i still cant figure out how to do that. <img src="smileys/smiley9.gif" border="0" align="middle" />

LI0NHART

Hi

Not sure if this is what you want..

Floor Switch

TELLES0808

Thanks ! Thats great. Thanks for your time <img src="smileys/smiley20.gif" border="0" align="middle" />

Hi,

i dont know the answer to your question, but i did see Ashley reply to another performance related question recently and he pointed to this.

scirra.com/blog/83/optimisation-dont-waste-your-time

TELLES0808

Thanks for the demo. Its close but the way i envisaged it would be that if there was another power route to the light and a junction was removed the light would still come on.

Magistross

Thats much closer although its very complex <img src="smileys/smiley1.gif" border="0" align="middle" /> I didnt want the connecting wire to disappear but i suppose thats an easy fix.

I would need to concentrate very hard to see how you had done it Ha.

Thanks to you both for your effort.

TELLES0808

Right i think i get the idea, never really thought about it being a 'real' connection but i guess it should work. Thanks

TELLES0808

I sort of tried that but i ended up with something very fixed which only applied to the circuit above. I wanted something which would apply to any circuit with multiple paths ( within reason of course ).

It may well be part of the answer but everytime i think about it my head fills with mud <img src="smileys/smiley5.gif" border="0" align="middle" />

vee41

Thanks for the quick response. Never used pathfinding but will take a look <img src="smileys/smiley1.gif" border="0" align="middle" />