AnD4D's Recent Forum Activity

  • Well I didn't know this! Very cool!

  • thehen

    I'm not a mathematician either. However, if I change the size of the object ever so slightly, the whole dynamic appears to change, so I have a feeling it's some kind of calculation, like density combined with the height and width.

    No idea though.

    If I do it all with the same number, smaller objects move faster than larger objects.

  • Yes, I suppose it does, but I'm just thinking ahead, and trying to keep my number of layers to a bare minimum.

    My top layer is usually "HUD", but at the point I am in the game atm, I am trying to set up the events before all of the graphics are done, so I'll probably have to go through and change a lot of events. I know I want my blackout to always be on top, and so I hoped there was a simple option for me.

  • thehen

    This could work, but I'm not sure how to get my physics objects mass without calling the mass function.

    The game's been designed with the mass controlling the physics, and certain levels require precision. I could do some trial and error with a variable to ensure it's close, but I don't know how to ensure I'm 100% correct.

    I didn't think about this possibility though. I guess that's why your game works with accelerated physics on :) You're not calling mass?

    I use the mass function so that I can turn gravity in any direction.

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads

  • Ashley

    Looking forward to the next build :)

    Don't think I'm targeting you or Tom on this. I know how much work you guys put into Construct 2, and it'a a beautiful piece of software. Simple and intuitive. You guys should be very proud of yourselves!

    My message was just a "misery loves company" plea :)

  • This waiting game is so very dull.

    I got my game nice and finished at the beginning of November, and still, 1 month later, I can't release it. I've been in contact with Ludei, who I actually sent my game to to help them fix the issues, got a reply back to say it's all done, and today I finally got to test out their new version 1.4.6.

    <img src="http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/3218/nvf1.png" border="0" />

    Some people appear to be having no issues at all when it comes to playing their physics based games through CocoonJS... but I've been reporting this error for around about 6 months, and frankly, it's unbelievable that it's still occurring.

    Sorry, just ranting here.

    For those working on mobile games. Test early, and if it doesn't work, I'd recommend you hold fire for a bit and focus on a PC game or something for a while.

    It's very demotivating indeed sitting on a completed project for over a month.

  • ArcadEd

    Very cool. Not sure if glitch, but I got the the forest and stepped on a bear-trap. The zombie stopped, fell through the floor, then appeared on top again, and fell over backwards.

  • ArcadEd

    Very fun! Spriter?

  • appbackr

    I've been told I need to update my game and provide my game name before 4/12. Today's the day, and I sent through the name along with a request as to how I resend the game, and I still haven't heard back.

    Is there a problem?

  • thiago I wonder if that would work. I'll have a try a bit later.

    —

    Yes, but my point is, some levels are going to have more layers than others, and not all layers may have the same name. I can go through each layer and ensure I either change the name or memorize it for the event setup, or I could just have the action occur to the uppermost layer.

    I am going to assume this isn't yet possible.

    Not a problem. I'm not yet at a position where this would be an issue. Just a shame, as I thought it's something that made sense.

  • thiago

    Do you know how to guarantee it's always the top most layout if you don't know the names?

  • Do it via numbers! All layers automatically get assigned a number. (Create on layer 0 for the topmost i think) :)

    Jase00 I was under the impression 0 was the lowest layer.

    zenox98 I mentioned this quite a few times over the last few months. I once had loads of layers (around 20), and was getting awful results on mobile. I managed to get this down to 4, and ended up with pretty smooth results.

    I wouldn't have thought it was a bug though...

AnD4D's avatar

AnD4D

Member since 4 Nov, 2011

Twitter
AnD4D has 3 followers

Connect with AnD4D

Trophy Case

  • 13-Year Club
  • Forum Contributor Made 100 posts in the forums
  • Forum Patron Made 500 posts in the forums
  • Forum Hero Made 1,000 posts in the forums
  • Coach One of your tutorials has over 1,000 readers
  • Regular Visitor Visited Construct.net 7 days in a row
  • RTFM Read the fabulous manual
  • Email Verified

Progress

20/44
How to earn trophies