Yeah, you are not alone on this one, I get the same problem. It will hopefully be fixed soon as they are investigating it. Never thought graphics cards companies were so retarded, but I guess they are. As I have learned that half the problems with HTML5 performance comes from them.

15 computers? O__o

The performance is already a problem with large dots, small dots would look more like water but you'd barely be able to see it and the frames would start dropping.

True, performance is still an issue with html5 with less powerful/older machines.

Wouldn't it be better if you made the dots smaller? I think it would look more liquid.

Also, those are definitely not real liquid physics. Though it would be nice to have them.

I benchmarked a 64fps on Chrome. Something must be up on yer end.

Glad to be of help. :)

Make it a global object?

It better to use smaller tiles. Using a large image it's not recommended.

I do remember that now that you mention it. Figures with my luck I fall into that category. -__-

Seems like all i7s get a 60 fps...

I don't get why Chrome browser is better than Awesomium

Yeah, I'm pretty sure Scirra said that Awesomium was gonna have better performance than browsers. Let's hope these are just issues of the early days.

Intel's graphcis aren't great, but they've been getting gradually better ? I'm suprised that 2 year old laptop i3 isn't performing that well.

I wish it was more common for people to have AMD/Nvidia graphic cards though.

Me too, specially since this is only 2D and a simple demo. Like I said before, I play games like Super Mario Galaxy 2 at 50 - 60 fps...