newt's Recent Forum Activity

  • Glad you had the experience, but.....

    get back in the kitchen?

  • Don't see why not, just have to pick those objects somehow.

    Not sure if a variable will work in conjunction with a family tho.

  • I find Gimp's interface infinitely easier than Photoshop's, and that's because I know it.

    Likewise I often hear those who try to migrate to Gimp complain that it's interface is hard to understand, they then ask if they can make it more like Photoshop, even though it couldn't make any difference in it's actual performance.

    The same thing has happened here.

    Scripting might be easier for those used to it, but when it comes down to it, a plug is just a better solution.

  • Check out the Perlin noise plug. It uses a seeded random which means if you set the seed to x number you will get the same output every time you use that number.

    Plus it outputs to an array... basically every thing you need to create nodes at computer generated set positions.

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads

  • [quote:3p4qob75]excuse me but ive seen bazilions of games with bigger and smother animations then this and they used 1/10 of the ram i am using.

    Actually it was probably much, much less less than that.

    As Mipey said, its not an animation you see in the utube.

    Search the forums there's a couple particle warp examples out there.

    Heck I think I did one with the path object.

  • Sorry, but that's way, way, way, way.... way out of the realms of whats possible.

    What your describing is more like a cut scene, than an animation.

  • Something that could pick by distance() would be nice.

  • Do yourself a favor and get a copy of Audacity. Chances are there's an artifact that you didn't hear in SFXR, but you can see it in Audacity, as well as edit it out.

    There's also the possibility that the format is wrong, you can change that too:

    http://audacity.sourceforge.net/

  • A feature is any unexpected behavior that can be exploited. Being able to have negative values should defiantly qualify for that definition, as you would expect an error.

    Although broken collisions are somewhat less exploitable, it should still qualify. Especially from the standpoint of the alternatives.

    They are:

    Stop the ability to have negative values.

    Rewrite it to allow for collision detection in negative values.

    Leave it as is, and possibly fix it in some future release.

    Given the situation we have for the upcoming 1.0, and the probability that the devs might consider the first alternative easier than the second, I say lets go with the third.

  • If your going to create, and destroy them for each layout, then don't use global.

    That's probably a better way to go anyway, especially if you resize anything.

    Global simply means keep that objects state from the previous layout.

  • I think the biggest one is that it misses clicks.

newt's avatar

newt

Member since 12 Nov, 2008

Twitter
newt has 27 followers

Connect with newt

pigmalien.github.io

Trophy Case

  • 16-Year Club
  • Entrepreneur Sold something in the asset store
  • Jupiter Mission Supports Gordon's mission to Jupiter
  • Forum Contributor Made 100 posts in the forums
  • Forum Patron Made 500 posts in the forums
  • Forum Hero Made 1,000 posts in the forums
  • Forum Wizard Made 5,000 posts in the forums
  • Forum Unicorn Made 10,000 posts in the forums
  • Popular Game One of your games has over 1,000 players
  • Regular Visitor Visited Construct.net 7 days in a row
  • Steady Visitor Visited Construct.net 30 days in a row
  • Enduring Visitor Visited Construct.net 90 days in a row
  • Unrelenting Visitor Visited Construct.net 180 days in a row
  • Continuous Visitor Visited Construct.net 365 days in a row
  • RTFM Read the fabulous manual
  • Email Verified

Progress

31/44
How to earn trophies