richlockard's Forum Posts

• • richlockard
  • 
  • • Joined 18 Feb, 2011
    • 
    • 0 topics • 2 posts
  • 1

  • 28 Sep, 2011
  • Quote

  Agree to suggestion #2, would be very useful for collision polygons co-ords <img src="smileys/smiley4.gif" border="0" align="middle" /> I was considering suggesting this myself <img src="smileys/smiley16.gif" border="0" align="middle" />

• Try Construct 3

  Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

  Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
• • richlockard
  • 
  • • Joined 18 Feb, 2011
    • 
    • 0 topics • 2 posts
  • 1

  • 18 Sep, 2011
  • Quote

  Now I think about it, it would make sense to do polygon collisions before physics really - otherwise all your physics collisions will be bounding box too!

  I Agree, and I voted for polygon collisions, though I would have a strong second vote for Physics. <img src="smileys/smiley1.gif" border="0" align="middle" />