I've visited the arcade a few times and have played only the Top-rated games.
I occasionally visit the arcade looking for ideas and I don't want to offend people but to be honest there is a lot of shit in there. Games that don't work as intended, some that just require polish and some that are just plain ugly. I hate to be using that word but I've made games that have been called exactly that which forced me to improve my art style maybe not to industry standards but at least presentable to the average player.
I understand that plenty of the games are just there for testing mechanics but I came across this quote from another thread:
I know you want to sell C2 and C3 engines but the fact is that most people visit Scirra to see the games and that is how they judge the quality of the engine and after they try the games in the arcade they go and get a free copy or maybe a licensed version.
and thought maybe the reason C2 isn't as popular as it should be is because of the amount of bad games. Maybe not the amount of bad games directly but the easy access to these games. Newgrounds has a quality control system where a game submitted is put in the judging section before it can be featured in the "New Games" section. I'm not proposing we delete the uploaded creations but maybe put them in a separate category named "test games" or something.
Obviously we have to scale down the amount of votes required to put these games since the arcade doesn't get as much visitors as NG or Kong . Maybe we can go with an average of 3-star rating or higher after 10 votes and your game is published in the New Games category and the ones that don't make it go to the "Test Games" category.
Do you agree the Scirra Arcade needs quality control? What would you propose?