Well it's the same.

BUT I succeeded to make it work;)

This by leaving the current room and joining another one. This way I could use "on peer connected" as I did before.

Thank you for your time and valuable help!

It makes sense. So I changed it in the host part with Multiplayer.PeerIDAt(LoopIndex) instead of peerid. But weirdly enough the problem is the same...

Thank you;)

Interesting,

Actually I'm not that serious about my game. Is there a simpler way to do it?

Great to hear that!

What do you suggest? Is there a tutorial that can teach me that?

Thank you it helps

Hey!

Do you guys know how to make an online system to store account names with passwords? So people could retrieve some simple variables when they log in in my game.

I hope I made myself clear...

Cheers,

Roland

Thanks!!

Interestingly enough when I try my game in the same settings but with a more powerful computer I have no issues whatsoever. It seems the script is just too much for my older computer. I could actually even experience some minor issues on the real-time example.

It really does make sense.

This is what I've updated:

I used the same basis as the multiplayer example, but added some few details:

- The player can run when the Shift key is down

- "gunnumber" is not used yet (but it is going to be to let the host know which gun the player is using)

- bulletx and -y is for hit testing as there is a recoil for guns so they don't shoot exactly where the crosshair is (note: there was lag before I made hit this hit testing)

Maybe it could be that I use the shadow caster function in combination to the multiplayer? Or that my Internet connection is bad?

Cheers

Thanks for that great answer.

It gives hope! I'm gonna update my code a bit and do some testing. And then come back to this post.

Yes that's what I understood: I will still need to sync 5 variables and have 6 inputs.

Does a lot of code/a lot of objects slow down the game? Does putting objects in a container save some bandwidth?

Kindly,

Roland