I'm not convinced the idea of "easy as Construct but with 3D" makes sense. For 2D, most people can draw some basic images and do a bit of simple math to help things interact. With 3D, how many people can quickly throw together a 3D model? How's your math for things like vectors, matrices and quaternions? The bar is higher, and I'm not sure there's much an easy-to-use tool can do to hide that, without turning in to a bit of a disappointing cookie-cutter engine.

I have not seen buildbox's 3d engine but I'm sure they made it a little bit more advanced then 2d. That's why we learn how to code, learn nodes or how to do math. And for the 3d models one person could throw up a 3d model fast if they learn quickly from blender (Just an example). If there new then they can learn how to throw up a 3d model. And if 3d is not for them then they can not use the 3d engine but there are people that love 3d and would like to create a game like that. One more thing a "cookie-cutter engine"? what do you mean :

I have not checked out any 3D engines like Unity or Unreal for example, but hey, if it has the ease of use Construct has and you can create 3D games that'd be pretty interesting.

I've got plenty of ideas for 3D games, but then again if you think about it, you will need to up your own skills as it will require 3D models. Everything will just be way more complicated. Programming too.

True but practice makes perfect

I have not played the game but I think you need to work on the graphics.

I disagree the graphics are fine as is for this game!

I was just wondering if you will ever add a dark mode to the construct website or will let us customize the color of it. Just asking because I get annoyed by the colors sometimes. Tom or Ashley who ever is in charge of the website.

Hi, when every I click on the babylon plugin it puts me in the home page for the plugin section not taking me to the babylon plugin page.

—

Please send me your project file and I'll see what I can do.

My email: doperst2006 (at) gmail.com

Sent you an email.

Hi dop I was wondering if you could clean up some of my code and notice anything that could be fixed? If your interested Message me on twitter and I will send you my email. twitter.com/GameDev1021

To be honest, I wouldn't want Construct 3 to be 3D.

That means, if it were 3D. The simple drag & drop to layout would be gone. And we'll have instead the XYZ based drag&drop editing, which is kind of counter-intuitive for 2D games.

Unless, 2 & 3 Dimensional Editors were to be separated.

Although, that is just the start of the problem. Realistically, maintenance would be way slower given the Construct Team is just a small team and a 3D Editor requires more to maintain and innovate.

It's easy to think that "Wow. It's easy to use Construct 3. Imagine if it were 3D too, it would be great. " But people sometimes don't understand that the reason it is easy to use is because it is mainly made to be easy-2D in the first place.

I wasn't talking about construct 3 in specific, but thanks for sharing

I was looking into buildbox and saw that they made a 3d version of their game engine. And I wanted to ask if you think a 3d version of construct would be something your interested in? I personally would be interested. (Not saying scrirra wants to create one)

The issue here that you need to check the player overlaps the water completely or not.

I use those condition to check it :

And this is my example : drive.google.com/open

Thanks