> Also why nobody mentionned the fact some people have to download a pirate copy to make it work sometimes? (Drm not working correctly makes us sad).
>
And this is an example for the last sentence above. Why do you think so? Why do they "have to"? If your smartphone doesn't work, you wait for the manufacturer to repair it. And if it doesn't get repaired in an acceptable amount of time, you have the right to get refunded. The same is true for software. But why waiting for an acceptable amount of time, if one can get a pirated version that works, for free and immediatly. There we are again. It's morally wrong. Do you see my point?
I see the point, I was just surprised to not have seen it being used already, as it is one of the harder one to counter (I actually prefer to have my not working game and remember the sins of the one who decided this drm was a good idea, rather than to download it and play it, and forget, "even if people are blocked by the drm, they will download it by other means and so not be blocked" OR THEY WON'T, and will not forgive easily, pirates in that case actually do the job of the ones who had to verify the drm was not an issue, which is even worse, since honest will have a worse experience that others)
In most of my cases, the acceptable amount of time was not enough for them to fix it, never got to play some of my games because of that, so I kept them, and have all the informations to not choose a game in the future, still looking for patches sometimes.
talking of that, I happenned to apply a community made installer for a game (said installer required the CD, and just adapted the install to patch the game to work correctly on newer systems, and also did it work in a no CD required way), I am wondering if that is considered legal or not now that i think about it.
— holy horsie O-o that is worrying.