If you're into 3rd party plugins you could just create the sprite you want in the first place (randomly) rather than leaving it up to the Family to choose. (nickname plugin). Otherwise all my thinking revolves around instance variables (like some ID value) that you'd have to set on all 100 sprites..

Has Google defined what a free app is? I would assume free means not getting a buck out of it, including ad revenue. I was planning on having cheap In-app purhaces to go with ads.

Maybe you didn't go to the OP's link but it says it only applies to paid apps or those with in-app purchases, so I guess a free app is one with neither. (assuming the author is right)

^^^ I'm not sure a PO box counts as a physical address.

But apart from all that... I'm not seeing any such request, and it was meant to take force by Sept 30. So maybe it's not everywhere, or not happening at all.

A timed event? You can use a Wait, or Every x seconds, or a Timer on an object, to delay between each event. If not, just have variables, stage1, stage2, etc.

post a capx please

Have you tried a 'wait 0' after the Create object? Or maybe use an 'on created' event to do the init.

Currently you can't do that. I also do an external search sometimes. One small tip, if you click on the object on the project tree view, and no properties are displayed for the object, then you know it is not used anywhere.

Make sure you preload the interstitial so there should be no delay showing it. Don't attempt to show it until you check for On interstitial received. Only show it at the end of the game where timing doesn't matter.

right click on it and choose 'invert'

I didn't do the dropdown..

Awesome

Here's a working example.

[attachment=0:1hv3v8f1][/attachment:1hv3v8f1]

Works here, that's fun Anyone out there used this much in their games?

If you've tried it and it doesn't then I guess it doesn't Would it be meaningful if you had say, a 3D array?

edit: sorry you've specifically said for X elements. I guess that could make sense. But a quick test shows it doesn't work. I normally use normal for loops and Array.at() anyway. Maybe it's the old school developer in me It's just more flexible IMO