The theme is nice but it does look very minimalist and places where it has titles for each section their's no background color change

which makes it all merged I think it would be nice to have it so that each title in each section has a decent different color so we can easily see the title

without searching through text and makes it look more professional in my opinion.

I noticed that when I went to go add an event for a sprite object the items highlight color turquoise green is not textually centered .

I've got a subscription also : ) one issue I'm having is their's no manual explaining all the the correct audio formats and correct picture formats,etc

to get the best quality representation which is very important for detail orientated individuals .

I'm also having the issue of gamejam license that others have experienced just to put that out their .

Other then that I'm enthralled by the quality of this game engine I could not careless if it's on the web browser

personally for me I like that it is means for those who want to play my game they can just run the website link

and if they really want the game offline they can download a zip file extract it an run the game from their

and it's that easy literally all I've gotta say is wow , if their was a time that I could actually finish a game project

this might finally be the one!.

Laurent If you are an indie developer and or hobbyist then I think you are okay with the personal license

but if you were someone like popcap or betheseda then you'd definitely need a business license

Id however like to hear it from the official developers mouth though to be shore : >.

Oh humanity theirs a fair amount of hate towards the Construct 3 game engine.

I think Construct 3 is vastly superior In terms of UI design then Construct 2

but I personally like construct 3s UI by a far margin compared to the slightly more weak Construct 2,

Having a runtime app would be more fun and personal though so I'm looking forward too that.

Everyone doesn't have a choice in this development of Construct 3 by the way it's merely a feedback loop that honestly I would say rarely

leads to actual implementation so all this but hurt drama going on is fairly pointless .

Scirra Team are taking a well informed risk but I will say that paying yearly is better then monthly for my case but I think

their should be more choices and options and no limitations attached depending on which one you pick .

Other then that I can't see myself not using Construct 3 unless the development goes sour for some burdening reason

aslong as my game idea's can be made in it.

ZakChaos

I have to say that bad capitalism should never ever be allowed and the mentality you hold for allowing product makers to sell their product for any hugely unfair price really allows for that so I think we have a right to say that we do not want to be paying for more then we should unless their's a fair reason for it .

William Henry Bill Gates III is a philanthropist he's making tons of money and only giving what he needs

not going to extraordinary lengths to cure common pitfalls in all kinds of research that he could be doing .

Jeff Bezos wants us all in a monopoly in space around the earth

Eric Schmidt is an asshole the list goes on an on.

These are not what you want to be supporting.

I vote for all options that are comfortable and easy for the developers and users fairly and equally.

Id say one off payment would always be nice but not with a huge price tag

id say a yearly subscription of small amount would be good enough if not better for scirra and some users personally

id say a monthly subscription will just help their userbase alittle more and satisfy some of the airy heads

id say a DLC model is a unlikely idea but if the price is a lot cheaper 5-10 pound per dlc update every say 1 year and the aesthetic were a lot greater maybe

The best method would be to let people decide how much they want to pay within fair bothways limits and within fair both ways timeframes

and provide decent rewards that don't effect the user experience negatively but effects it positively and then not reward gating them apart

from the initial subscription just giving them free digital stuff

that is always evolving and getting better they should be more like very productive , fun , aesthetically pleasing plugins,etc and

deeper behind the scenes stuff then keep evolving and branching out from their

without burdening others in the process.

That result could possibly lead to a smaller income of say maybe up to a million dollars or pounds whatever your currency is more or less

every month and or every year or whatever but a much more consistent and stable userbase and a lot more passion and activity

then you can just charge a small one off price again every significant number version

Construct 4 , Construct 5 aslong as it's worth the upgrade just for that extra income and I don't think many people would

be pissed off with paying for alittle work right ?

Rewarding your users in evolving intelligent not going to steal your money intentionally ways is always the better way slower but fast in the longrun

it's not badly captalistic because we are paying you for the work in return we are getting a piece of software and free stuff.

I will have to pay the subscription if their is no other option so and paying yearly for me is much better then paying monthly.

I vote for all options that are comfortable and easy for the developers and users fairly and equally.

Id say one off payment would always be nice but not with a huge price tag

id say a yearly subscription of small amount would be good enough if not better for scirra

id say a monthly subscription will just help their userbase alittle more and satisfy some of the airy heads

id say a DLC model is a unlikely idea but if the price is a lot cheaper 5-10 pound per dlc update every say 1 year and the aesthetic were a lot greater maybe

The best method would be to let people decide how much they want to pay within fair bothways limits and within fair both ways timeframes

and provide decent rewards that don't effect the user experience negatively but effects it positively and then not reward gating them apart

from the initial subscription just giving them free digital stuff

that is always evolving and getting better they should be more like very productive , fun , aesthetically pleasing plugins,etc and

deeper behind the scenes stuff then keep evolving and branching out from their

without burdening others in the process.

That result could possibly lead to a smaller income of say maybe up to a million dollars or pounds whatever your currency is more or less

but a much more consistent and stable userbase and a lot more passion and activity

then you can just charge a small one off price again every significant number version

Construct 4 , Construct 5 aslong as it's worth the upgrade just for that extra income and I don't think many people would

be pissed off with paying for alittle work right ?

Rewarding your users in evolving intelligent not going to steal your money intentionally ways is always the better way slower but fast in the longrun

it's not badly captalistic because we are paying you for the work in return we are getting a piece of software and free stuff.

I would strongly recommend a year sub and a monthly sub not just a monthly sub because I prefer the yearly sub if It comes down to it.

Havok I'm sorta in your boat I like construct 3 regardless but I do think their's some ignorance or delusion going on in the development

of the construct engine which should be publically announced officially unless It has already in which case ignore that little part.

Ashley I respect your work by the way and I don't consider you a bad person and I'm not trying to discredit your success.

Their apparently not listening to this and have other agenda's ("being too rich which is such a bad business decision or money stability"),

they would only listen if the entire population of construct users stoppped using their service

but then they probably would say we won't be able to continue making the software

which is just bogus so it seems like their's some kind of delusions going on in the minds of someone.

However if it comes down to it and their's no other way I'll probably get C3

because I want to make a fucking game had enough of trying to program with no extensive and proper results.

In my mind I am not bashing the developers, I am trying to help.

I have C2 but I like C3 better.

I hate hate... the way life decisions work .

Wow people are really going at ashley ... He's a fucking expert or even an amazing mathmatician as far as I'm concerned

and the products he and his fellows are making arn't extremely bad obviously

I think everyone would do their product differently and I see many many flaws being a designer even

in a piano but regardless I think moving to web browser did put a performance hit on the engine in comparison to the c2 c++ version but the engine

is not exactly terrible at all their are a few things that bother me like enabling a effect whilst in the event sheet with that rather strange text input

based selection but I think that gives us more control so I wouldn't consider that a problem more of strange but useful oddity and I hope

it gets updated to be more simpler or in the manual it explains how to use it properly also I noticed a bug in the sprite editor

If you draw a shape then fill it in that shape will not be completely filled their will be one or two pixel gap also I don't think the way

options are layed out in the object actions window or even the event window is exactly the most simplest it could be stuff that is most important

does not seem to be clearly viewable you have to scroll around or ask someone on the forum to find out where certain actions are

but other then those few things the editor is solid as fuck soo I don't know ,

personally I would favour both the web browser application one and a software application

if I had a gun to my head Id pick the fastest and more efficient option and I think well honestly javascript is not as super fast as c++ or assembly

or even binary and possibly machine hardware it self but making a web browser version means cross platform issues are basically

alot more mute , you can still do everything you wanna do the speed decrease is rather negligible possibly I havn't tested it properly

and c++ is a lot more trouble sooo maybe it's for the best that it's web browser now...?

I have aspergers , ADHD ,etc so it's harder for me to be a programmer then your usual.

Either way I need construct 3 to be finished otherwise I'm never going to be able to be a game developer unless

I can find graphics programmer who is passionate about mathmatics in game development which is alittle bit of an strange world to be in

and I could go that route but preferences will no doubt clash and I'll end on my ass soo...

I want what's best for everyone and the most efficient option so maybe their should have been a intelligently described voting system

where before the options are defined and shown their is a disclaimer that gives you a decent background on the actual evolution

of ease of accessibility and so on also the vote options should be described in simplified detail and their results in simplified detail .

Obviously that vote has long gone now but maybe in the future that should happen.