I just realized If I make layer "menu" visible in layout 1 and go to layout 2 the layer is not visible. If I go back to layout 1 it is visible again. I only just realized it now because I was manually setting menu layer visible/invisible for other reasons and decided to stop doing it. Is there a way to prevent C3 from independently remembering layer visibility between layouts on it's own? It is happening automatically, do I have to manually set layer visibility between layouts or is there a way to systematically disable it?

Layer Menu is a global layer.

dropbox.com/s/faw6mtwy9re3ntv/layoutMenu.c3p

I am using C3 as an app in a just updated chrome.

Chrome is up to date

Version 110.0.5481.97 (Official Build) (64-bit)

C3

Release r327.2 stable

I was told that CPU limits to only 1 task at a time.

I just want to confirm, but I think it doesn't fully matter since C3 reads logic in order one line at a time.

1,2 gets a syntax error in the editor and "1,2" looks for key 1,2.

'Add key' makes a new key called 1,2.

I don't know what you mean by "1,2". It would just look for key 1,2 instead of key 1 token 2. I am guessing it isn't possible. I am currently just setting a string and then setting it to a dictionary key. I have a 'for each' loop to set the string, I feel I shouldn't need one there though.

I will probably just use an array and set it to dictionary key AsJSON. It may simplify what I am doing and get rid of that loop. Right now I have objects getting info from other objects to create a new object, an array will make it more simple. I still would rather just be able to set a token though.

Yes I know, it is why I didn't post a c3p. I was wanting to know how to set the token or if it had to be structured a specific way. 'Add key' makes a new key with the token value.

I was thinking I will have to use a string or array and setting it's value properly then setting the dictionary key to it, but I was wanting to avoid that. It seems like an unnecessary extra step.

I thought it would only really be the expression, but here. It is only 2 events.

Edited to remove dead link.

tokenat(src, index, separator)

I have Dictionary: Set Key tokenat(Dictionary.Get("Inventory"),2,",") to value "A" but it doesn't seem to be doing anything in runtime.

If I set a variable to tokenat(Dictionary.Get("Inventory"),2,",") then it gives the proper token value.

How do I set a token in a dictionary?

How do I add a token to the dictionary key?

I mostly need to know how to structure it differently or a different expression. I am guessing it is selecting the value of the token instead of the token. I haven't figured out how to select the token.

I understand this may be a large ask, but I am not sure. I also don't know the limits of BigInt/Script. Can somebody make me a C3p with Script and BigInt so I can Add, Subtract, Multiply, Divide and Exponent with large numbers. This shouldn't be a big ask, but I need about 4 decimal on division for accuracy. I have a mostly done C3p that does those maths with stings, but feel BigInt, Script will perform better.

Yes you are right about forcing input with number fields, then you can grab it with a string if needed. What I am working on is just in the debugger right now so there isn't a user input. What I was preparing it for has a text field. I selected a text field over a number field because there is a List object that changes what digits and non-digits are allowed. I was only wanting to know what the error meant. I wasn't sure if the site was giving a false alarm or not because I found another site that didn't give the error. I ended up using (^[0+\D]*)*(\D) for now. I checked on a few sites and it gave the proper results without the error. I couldn't have made it without you for sure. I will need to adjust it later for specific characters when I move it to another project, but I understand how to add a few search patterns now. Thanks again for the help.

mrcgkh Thanks, I looked at it and already have something similar. Regex is efficient and I need that because the project I am going to use it in has a few loops already.