dimakoles's Recent Forum Activity

  • Then use another behavior :) Custom movement behavior is more detailed.Okay, thank you

  • Just set max speed to 500. Acc does slowly or fast increases the speed until its max. So Acc 5000 + Speed 500 = instant move the Sprite on 500 Speed^^.If I want to set velocity to 500 without acceleration why should I think about acceleration? Just

    velocity = 500

    acceleration = 0

    will be nicer :-)

  • Hm, so what do you want to make exactly?I want to make velocity of object equals to 500 and I'm confused with C2 approach that has acceleration variable instead of velocity variable. This is not question :-)

  • Try Construct 3

    Develop games in your browser. Powerful, performant & highly capable.

    Try Now Construct 3 users don't see these ads
  • One thing I've missed out is that C2 does not allow me to make build fail.

    <img src="http://s21.postimg.org/cfriyebiv/wwttttt.png" border="0" />

    Now I understand why C2 does not require programming. Thanks for your replies.

  • Putting it to 5000 and there is no visible progres of acceleration, cause it's instanly at its max speed. :PI mean I expect velocity instead of acceleration

  • dimakoles: If you want to move instant, just change acc and dec to 5000^^. There might be another way, but this is one of them^^. Just don't put Max Speed too high, 200-500 should be fine, experiment with it.You want to say that if I want to make acceleration equals to 0 I should change it to 5000?

    That's really very intuitive and simple :-)

  • That's just mathematics language.

    This is algebra

    X = Self.X + Self.speed * dt

    this if code

    if(self.x != 0){ return self.x + self.speed * dt }

    This is not algebra because algebra does not know about expression "Self."

  • Thank for this!

    <img src="http://s21.postimg.org/vsgkz65ef/iiiiiiiiiii.png" border="0" />

    I need make motion without acceleration, what should I edit? Unfortunately it's not obvious for me.

  • Personally I can not say that if some solutions is better with code than with GUI then C2 still does not required programming.

  • Yes, in this simple example C2 does not required programming.

    But in this simple example programming is easier than no-programming.

    So: if using C2 I should to learn basic stuff about programming, why C2 consider I am not able to learn more advanced stuff?

    But if C2 consider I can learn more advanced stuff - than what is the point in C2?

    PS

    For example, I can not avoid "random(int i)" function if I want it.

  • Agreed "X = Self.X + Self.speed * dt" is simple code. But it is code. Why C2 says that it does not required programming?

    If using C2 I should to learn basic stuff about programming, why C2 consider I am not able to learn more advanced stuff?

    But if C2 consider I can learn more advanced stuff - than what is the point in C2?

  • "Many behaviors" does not mean all behaviors I need in my project.

    Personally for me "Self." is confusing. I do not know from math what "Self." means

dimakoles's avatar

dimakoles

Member since 20 Nov, 2011

None one is following dimakoles yet!

Trophy Case

  • 13-Year Club
  • Email Verified

Progress

14/44
How to earn trophies