>
> It tended to be complaints from the countries where $99 is a huge amount...
>
Not my issue with it.
> ...if my aim is to make money with games, then 99/year is downright laughably cheap!
>
But you only make money if you actually end up fully following through with it.. and how many times does that happen with even people trying to release something? Probably less often than not.
For a lot of people with plans but not necessarily time/life stuff comes up (intermittent users), it's not a great value if you're not using it a lot of the year. (To say nothing of the ownership issue.)
Even for a subscription scheme, the annual buy-in still seems to me a crazy/terrible choice. It's a bad fit for intermittent users. (This is not like Spotify or something where you can find time to use the service pretty much anytime). If not month to month, at least a 6 month option should be available.
I didn't write that..