Not bashing C3 here (I'm excited for the new software), just my honest opinion: To me, C3 just seems like a polished version of C2.
1. Yes, C3 is browser-based and can be accessed on the go. But I do not care because I use C2 on my work laptop at home, there is no need for mobile access.
2. Yes, C3 provides an Android build. But I get the same result when using Cocoon IO (besides a splash screen). In addition to that, I don't have to pay anything using Cocoon, which saves me 139$ a year.
3. Yes, C3 provides a new dark-coloured theme. People... I don't care what color the interface has.
4. The C3 website plights easy export to Android, not directly stating that you still have to sign your apps afterwards. That's just a waste of time for people who know how to do this and a big obstacle for people who do not know how to sign an app.
5. There is no tutorial on how to export to iOS, as far as I know. I feel like there is less emphasis on iOS export.
6. There still is no native share function for mobile apps. So even if you publish an app, your distribution ******
Let me be clear here: I am using C2 to publish apps and to make money. I want C3 to be good, because it has a lot of potential! But currently, there are major issues preventing C3 from being a software suitable for business use.
If the following points are fullfilled:
- Give me an included APK signer for Android builds!
- Show me how to export to iOS! Make it as easy as possible!
- Let me share my mobile apps on Facebook and Twitter!
I will gladly give you my money and recommend this software to other people. Till then, I won't.