Construct 3 r393

You're viewing a single comment in a conversation. View all the comments
  • 4 Comments

  • Order by
    • [-] [+]
    • 0
    • Ashley's avatar
    • Ashley
    • Construct Team Founder
    • 0 points
    • *
    • (3 children)

    We don't intend to make Construct in to a full 3D engine. This at least gives addon developers a way to do more 3D features without having to wait for us to turn Construct in to a 3D engine. If you don't like it and want us to make a full 3D engine, well, that probably won't happen. So you'll be waiting a long time! Would you prefer it if we didn't try to provide additional ways to use 3D in Construct? If such efforts only result in negativity, maybe we shouldn't even try, and we'll just stick to 2D features from now on.

    • I love playing with the 3D in construct. Please don't stop. No one expects a full 3d engine from you guys, everyone knows its a 2D engine. 3rd party devs just need a little bit more to be able to create some amazing stuff. It's doesn't only benefit 3d but also for 2d too! We know even adding something small can cause bugs to happen, but we would really appreciate it if you guys could at least try it. If there are truly any unfixable bugs and glitches, then we would understand.

    • Please don't stop and don't be discouraged. All three.js-related improvements are highly appreciated!

    • three.js can be an interesting way of achieving 3d. I can see how objects can be placed in the editor and those would be translated as 3d objects with three.js at runtime.