No control over many bugs

And that can be increased with C3 not?

It's better people who criticize with fundamentals and not the fanboys who defend anything without thinking

If you really want to improve, you get more listening to the critics than the fanboys

Well apart from the fanboyism/hate relationship that there is currently (which I don't get but whatever), PixelPower does have a point:

Scirra does tend to not fix bugs coming from a third party ("Close as won't fix" anyone?), which break our games multiple times in the past for sometimes a very long wait (the jank/stutter), imagine a bug similar happens and break C3, oh my god, I hope they have a plan for that, because telling users not to update their browser would be downright stupid.

Totally agree

Is the problem of making Construct 3 work in the browser if something breaks in the browser Scirra have no control to fix it

AnD4D You do not understand what i mean

por cierto te lo dire en español

No hay más necio que el que no quiere entender ni aprender.

>

> I hope that the subscription model fails miserably and so learn to listen to the community

>

Ah, that's poor form. You shouldn't ever wish failure on anyone. It's easy to be bummed, but take a breather on that thinking.

You're wrong, it's not personal, I do not wish bad things to anyone, I was going to buy C3, but I do not want a subscriptions system, that's why I want it to fail, but I do not want C3 to fail, only the subscriptions system

can you understand it?

[quote:3n3ksy3z]But just one question, while the decision is already made, lets say this model of subscription don't work as intended, would you guys be whilling to reconsider it and go back to pay-once model? Or at least that kind of discussion between you could happen?

Well yes, if the model fails we'd of course have to re-evaluate otherwise we'd be fools!

I hope that the subscription model fails miserably and so learn to listen to the community

Before 27 and 7

Now 37 and 9

The progression in favor of "buy" increases more faster

Is a fact to think about.. no?

> Nah, the fallout would have been far worse if they had waited to announce these exact features.

> This way they don't have to worry about the users who wouldn't have paid for the new scheme anyways.

> Now all they have to do is build up the value of C3, hence the trickle of information.

>

That was our thinking!

I do not like this lack of respect for so many users who supported Scirra

bad very bad

[quote:1qzmxoci]At the moment, according to this vote, (7 subscriptions , 27 Buys) Scirra loses money with the subscription

7 subscriptions for 5 years = 7 * 5 * 99 dollars = 3465 dollars

27 buys for ever = 27 *99 dollars = 2673 dollars

It's mathematical !

3465 dollars in five years , 1 year = 693 $

27 buys for ever = 27 *150 dollars = 4050 dollars in one year

At the moment, according to this vote, (7 subscriptions , 27 Buys) Scirra loses money with the subscription

Can they see this?

Rectify is wise, if they do not change they will lose many users