No, at least for the moment. The new C3 features are not so breathtaking IMHO and I really don't like browsers.

Like many others, I too have a couple of C2 projects in development that heavily rely on 3rd-party-plugins currently missing on C3 (and some of them I'm afraid will not be ported oat all... ).

Maybe I'll subscribe in a future, when/if the C3 export function will accept C2 projects too, or C3 will suit my needs, we'll see

Event Editor

- could you please add something that will show current zoom level? I've accidentally change it and it looks kind of "wrong" for my eyes, and i can't change it back cause I have no idea how it was by default

- ability to reset zoom to 100%

Layout Editor

- ability to set zoom by typing in some value

- ability to set custom zoom steps - currently it goes like 100-110-121-133-146-161-177.... and so on. I like it be 100-125-150-175-200...

- some clear way to reset zoom to 100% it's not obvious at start that you can double click at "Zoom: xxx" in the corner to do that

+ 1

Cool!

Great! thanks a zillion

In my previous post I forgot to make a request for the extremely useful

LJPotential by Rex

no hurry...

many thx in advance!

Other two extremely important plugs are (of course IMHO):

Chipmunk physics & Canvas by R0j0hound

— - you deserve a free license for all of the amazing work you have done to extend C2 and to help so many other developers

+1000

btw, waiting for paypal & for at least some third party plugins availability to subscribe.

Tom: is the Construct 3 export function for C2 projects (i.e. to build an app exported from Construct 2) already working for subscribers? thx

It is nice to see that you plugin-developer-guys do this hell of an afford to get those plugins into c2.3.

It is even nicer to see that you plugin-developer-guys work together to get that gd job done.

Appreciated & Many Thanks.

99.

+ 1

Thank you guys for all your efforts.

Bedroom developer here - I'm a hobbyist, but I'd like to try publishing something small, say,

for this year's end or so. I have no need for advanced features (raycasters, layered sprites etc.) , so

C2 "as is" suit perfectly my personal needs, and so is for C3 features.

My main thoughts on C3 (well, first impressions, but I missed the previous thread )

PRO:

- New exporter "get rid of XDK"

- Some of the actual improvement (webfonts, new editors, bullet stepping...) and

the hope for great ones in the foreseeable future

The mobile interface is nice but I'm not interested in...

CONTRA:

- Web interface & C3-as-a-service, the thing I don't like at all (personal taste)

(but luckily we can work offline and maybe have a desktop .exe in the future)

- Subscription, of course (even if it is understandable IMHO)

- Above all: the continuing dependance on the good will of the plugin developers' for the

availability of 3rd party plugins (and they are absolutely essential, IMHO)

So I'll subscribe at least for the first year, for appreciation & support, to be able to use the new export (possibly for C2 projects if C3 lacks some plugin), and to test the "full" C3. We'll see.

There is a quite effective Rex's plugin for the action comments, maybe you don't know it:

https://www.scirra.com/forum/plugin-rex-comment_t125942

(...) C3 (...) at this point its not even close to C2. It feels like this is a very first version and Scirra just starting to create an engine.

Exactly this, at the moment there is an astonishing amount of bugs... I'm wondering how much time will be necessary to have a full working version

- It looks like Construct for Kids. It just doesn't feel professional, if that makes sense, especially coming from the crispness of C2. The UI is way too big and clunky - the fonts are too big, the padding around them too great, and the grey bars around each window are so thick. For example, the palette windows: the section titles sit in these large, grey blobs, and the options in the palette have little grey blobs indenting them.

+ 1

I would happily pay another $99 (no subscription) for a package of working features and exporters for the existing C2 engine and I think most C2 game designers would be willing to support Scirra in that way.

+ 1