Thank you Ashley! You can close this <3

Thanks for the reply Ashley. It's a Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X

https://www.gsmarena.com/xiaomi_redmi_note_4x-8580.php

Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

It's not entry level and absolutely does have an accelerometer.

Other proof is that the same device *used* to work with chrome a month ago, and the same device apparently works with Chrome Canary and Chrome Dev, just tested. Just not the vanilla chrome and phonegap build.

Should I be bugging chromium devs instead? It's a little maddening.

Also I take it the capx works for you on your test device?

Problem Description

Android Chrome doesn't read XYZ acceleration values (with or without G), but DOES read Alpha, Beta and Gamma.

The android device is obviously equipped with an accelerometer, which is testable because Firefox works fine.

It also seems to affect cordova and phonegap, so maybe a chromium problem? I don't know their infrastructure.

Attach a Capx

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ytsctdvg3s4f4z5/bug.capx?dl=0

Description of Capx

This capx prints out X acceleration and Gamma

Steps to Reproduce Bug

• Step 1 run it on an android device using chrome
• Step 2 run it on an android device using firefox

Observed Result

Chrome doesn't read accelerometer data. Firefox does. Both read gamma

Expected Result

Chrome should read accelerometer data

Affected Browsers

• Chrome: (YES/NO)
• FireFox: (YES/NO)
• Internet Explorer: (YES/NO)

Operating System and Service Pack

Windows 10 10.0.16299 build 16299, but doesn't really matter because construct 3 does the exact same and C3 is OS independent innit?

Construct 2 Version ID

v255

A game made in 3 days, it's a shmup with a unique Absorb mechanic.

It's the sort of thing Construct 2 excels at.

Special thanks to the devs of Glokar — and 7Soul for their neat and tidy code, it helped a lot with enemy patterns, it was much tidier code than I would have come up with <3

Play it here:

https://castpixel.itch.io/fusecell

Fabian Luarte yes of course:

here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6_Uw_-Ku5yISnlPNG9URXIxcVE/view?usp=sharing

I also updated the link on the first page.

of course! http://puu.sh/vs3lw/219ba0875d.capx (check the "pathfinder" function at the bottom)

I think I know what's going on too, I'm telling it to follow the largest number instead of branching out. But I'm not sure how to fix.

forgive me for necro-ing the post alextro and/or R0J0hound but I'd love to see your implementation with an array.

I'm trying to fill this array full of "P"s with a flood fill, and am failing miserably. "For each XY element" does just one row and one column (and their neighbors).

I don't know why it's not traversing the whole array. Are you perhaps spawning miners for each new number that occurs? So that there's a lot of miners simultaneously going around the array and changing things?

thank you

I've read through every post carefully.

I'm a hobbyist dev, I've bought two personal licenses for C2 in the last 5 years (one for a friend) and I loved every second of it, apart from the platform jump height bug that I've had to live with in C2 and I'm hearing is now fixable. Could it, I wonder, be an optional switch in C2 as well? It would mean a lot to me <3

Re: pricing, I've been priced out of software before, I stopped upgrading photoshop at CS6. $99 a year is too steep for me, the economic situation in greece being what it is and declining further every day. I know that's my problem to deal with, not something a company that needs to stay competitive needs to assess, but seeing formerly well-to-do friends suddenly have no money for food and shelter makes me think twice about switching to C3.

So in this precarious economy (which is reaching other European countries fast) switching to C3 isn't just about one year's worth of subscription, which I can fit into my budget, it's about becoming chained to one more recurring expense, when every survival instinct is telling me I should cut down on everything.

I know you've assessed the market and think that's the way to go if you want to have a viable product, and it's ok.

I'll be sad to miss out, but since the new product is better, it makes sense that it's a lot more expensive and that poor people will be priced out of it.

well since this was resurrected, let me just pop in to say newt I'm still surprised at your disagreement. this works fine