A year may seem like a long time development wise, but I'd say we've done pretty well to do what we have in a year .

Consider that in the early days there were bugs like 'preview doesn't work' or 'start of layout doesn't trigger', etc.

It has been a quick year though.. time really flies.

Agreed! Stupid IOJ.

Re-upload them!

Yes, that's how it'd work .

907mb! I'm using 154mb after 3 years useage.. well done .

Indeed, a chat here would be really cool; I'll try find a PHPBB3 mod to add one (nonintrusive, obviously).

Just to pitch in here:

Personally I don't see flags as necessary; they'd need to be set up via properties anyways, so it's just some more clutter. Variables are the proper solution, just switch between 1 and 0 like Ashley said.

One thing that could be done is boolean variables (using a combobox with On/Off or so in it), I'd imagine that'd be easy to add.

It'd be possible to have 'event behaviors' which could be attached to an object.. but they'd be done differently (no setting them up via properties, utilising them via events, if you see what I mean).

It'd still be pretty useful though, so consider it on the todo list for some point closely following 1.0.

Holy crap.. I had no idea how talented people on here are.

I couldn't even come close to any of it .

Ditto by the way, I feel really bad that we can't get much done at the moment.. please though, all your testing and bug reports will be dealt with, and we will get to 1.0. Don't worry .

Good idea, kinda silly that it isn't there right now, but definitely doable fairly simply!

Also a way to flip all hotspots in a set of frames would be good (nudge, David, nudge).

Exporting to behavior would be really cool.. and it is with massive regret that I say it isn't possible (at least not in the way that behaviors work right now).

Still, exporting/importing event sheets is definitely doable and would go some way to making up for it, and allow for some neat stuff to be put on the forum for sharing.

I've finished a law degree, and David's doing computer science.

Here's the other side of the coin though:

For every Dawkins you hear of, there's about 50 similar extremely-viewed people of any known religion. Dawkins is just the other end of the scale.

Still, this is definitely a bad idea. What does it aim to accomplish? Religious advertisements shouldn't be allowed, fullstop.. it's secular and I should be allowed to get a bus without having the word of God forced upon me.